메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박노현 (상지영서대학교)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제25호
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
81 - 106 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The teaching consideration of Han Feizi (韓非子) was originated from one of the main leading factions of Oriental thoughts in ancient China from the Zhou dynasty to the Chao dynasty (770-403 B.C.E.). His point of view was in suitabilities as well as in realities of life at that time. Especially he rearranged the defects of previous philosophers’ ideas. Also many of his practical alternatives were contributed to the valuable worths.
The Zhou dynasty to the Chao dynasty was confronted with each others’ countries to expand their territories At that time all philosophers and scholars tried to solve the problems themselves by the suggestions for governing and guiding for their countries which were political solutions. The philosophers, Confucius (孔子), Mencius (孟子), Xunzi (荀子), Mozi (墨子), Laozi (老子), Zhuangzi (莊子), etc., they had no ethical norms to solve the problems.
Although Han Feizi’s philosophy agreed partly the government and enlightenment over human beings’ natural state, he believed that their philosophy couldn’t be the basic solution against the confused and troubled times. So he insisted that the a new suitable political strategy is to be centered by the law-governed state by political power. Han Feizi criticized Shen Buhai (申不害) who insisted on using only artifices not the application of law and Shang Yang (商?) who insisted on using only artifices not the application of law. Therefore he insisted on using jointly the application of artifices and laws. Also he insisted that a state is a monarch’s horse, therefore he could controll by artifice. he believed that if in case of disregarding on the relations of law and artifice and power. As we have examined above, Han Feizi power same time. Also that means that the relation of artifice and power shows unavoidably.
According to the above, Han Feizi regarded courtesy as power and use as law and artifice, And he studied and analyzed Xian Qin’s (先秦) lawful idea. And he reorganized Xian Qin’s works, which was described that monarch’s sovereign power was regarded as important means of law and artifice to execute his state.

목차

제1장. 序論
제2장. 韓非子의 生涯 및 時代的 背景
제3장. 韓非子의 法·術·勢治論
제4장. 結論
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000806987