지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research discusses how human mind works through examining Freud and the only idea of Buddhism. Both Freud and the only idea of Buddhism tried to understand the deep level of the human psychology through analogy, which have been recognized by professionals as well as the public. Since Freud coined the term, unconsciousness, it has been household terms to explain human minds. According to Freud, what humans experience during the upbringing process reflects the personality of an individual. Freud contends that the instinctive impulse energy toward something the person is interested in is reflected in the human psychology.
The original characteristics of ?laya-vijn?na is purity, which helps to understand the fundamental psychological structure of only idea. They boost understanding the self, which eventually make life full and powerful. According to Buddhist teaching, if a human understand show ?laya-vijn?na is of only idea works, he or she can understand his or her self, which leads to the rich life. In addition, enlightenment on the only idea enriches human life.
There is a difference between Freud’s interpretation on dreams and only idea. In only idea of Buddhism, dream is considered as the analogy to teach vanity of life whereas dreams of Freud are vehicles to explore psychological problems. Freud’s interpretation on dreams is similar to the ancient religious idea that interprets dreams as a message or oracles. To Freud, interpreting dreams is an act of art. The symbols that are shown in dreams cannot be interpreted literally. Interpreters must consider the implication of parts of the dreams and its association with dreamers’ situations. This paper aims to examine why both Freud and only idea of Buddhism need various interpretation on dreams as a medium.
The original characteristics of ?laya-vijn?na is purity, which helps to understand the fundamental psychological structure of only idea. They boost understanding the self, which eventually make life full and powerful. According to Buddhist teaching, if a human understand show ?laya-vijn?na is of only idea works, he or she can understand his or her self, which leads to the rich life. In addition, enlightenment on the only idea enriches human life.
There is a difference between Freud’s interpretation on dreams and only idea. In only idea of Buddhism, dream is considered as the analogy to teach vanity of life whereas dreams of Freud are vehicles to explore psychological problems. Freud’s interpretation on dreams is similar to the ancient religious idea that interprets dreams as a message or oracles. To Freud, interpreting dreams is an act of art. The symbols that are shown in dreams cannot be interpreted literally. Interpreters must consider the implication of parts of the dreams and its association with dreamers’ situations. This paper aims to examine why both Freud and only idea of Buddhism need various interpretation on dreams as a medium.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 유비를 통한 메커니즘 확립
Ⅲ. 알라야식의 청정성과 프로이트의 정직성
Ⅳ. 꿈에 관련된 그들의 이론
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000806907