메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신두호 (강원대학교)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제26호
발행연도
2012.6
수록면
97 - 123 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Throughout his fiction and nonfiction works, John Steinbeck embodies in his characters or directly elaborates a philosophical vision. His vision is similar or parallel to both American tradition such as transcendentalism and modern ecological thinking on the one hand and Asian religious and philosophical tradition, on the other hand. This similarity has led Steinbeck scholars to make frequent comparative studies between his thinking and American or Asian tradition, exploring probable influences on Steinbeck from such traditions, because he did not directly mention nor did he leave any records on this matter. This autobiographical deficiency of proof has resulted in two tendencies in such comparative studies: the first is an obsessive hunting of resources that may hint the influence or connection. The second tendency is a restricted, arbitrary, or even distorted interpretation of Steinbeck. The core of Steinbeck’s philosophy and thinking lies in eco-cosmopolitanism that embraces both American and Asian tradition. And it is not too irrelevant to argue that Steinbeck intentionally did not mention, despite high probability, any influences from or connections to either tradition with the intention that his ecocosmopolitanism would not be confined to either tradition. Eco-cosmopolitanism entails a new environmental imagination of the global that is indeed needed for the current and future generations and, therefore, this concept promises to regenerate Steinbeck into a new perspective.

목차

인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000806518