메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이성옥 (한국건설기술연구원) 배철학 (한국시설안전공단)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第28 第11號
발행연도
2012.11
수록면
195 - 206 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze problems and suggest improvements via a status analysis of evaluation criteria and a method for three years after revisions to the standard of the Housing Performance Grading Indication System. The grade distribution works of four accreditation authorities were searched for grading distribution by performance item for 144 cases acknowledged for a ‘new standard’ (revised standard). It was revealed that ‘unequal distribution’, in which only certain grading was focused on, and ‘no-grading’, in which specific grading was not shown occurred on 17 items amongst the entire 27 performance items. The items shown only in ‘unequal distribution’ were generated for crime prevention content and horizontal evacuation distance. Only ‘no grading’ items were generated in seven items, which were heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation, remodeling & maintenance(common space), daylight, home networks, fire detection & warning facilities, smoke release & evacuation facilities, and so on. Items in which both ‘unequal distribution’ and ‘no grading’ were generated include noise emission in bathrooms, outside noise in sound insulation-related grading, remodeling & maintenance(private space), durability, and application of low emission product, ventilation performance for household units, consideration for the socially underprivileged, such as the elderly, etc. (private space), fire resistance performance. A commonly used method was applied to the evaluation criteria of each performance item in which ‘unequal distribution’ occurred for construction, and this is grading can be acknowledged without much difficulty. This shows that the housing performance grading acknowledgement criteria is lacking in discrimination from others. Evaluation criteria not showing ★★★★ amongst the evaluation criteria of each performance item shows that it is a criteria that is quite difficult to acknowledge for performance grading, and items not occurring ★ shows that a construction method was applied, which is basically applied to current apartment housing, and thus has no discrimination from others.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 주택성능등급표시제도의 개요 및 성능범주의 특성
3. 성능부문별 인정현황 및 세부성능항목별 문제점 분석
4. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (3)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-540-000815016