지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.12
- 수록면
- 125 - 159 (35page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The appellation “Christian Darwinism” has been used as early as 1867, and its representatives on both sides of Atlantic Ocean were among the most orthodox of the post-Darwinian controversialists. This paper aims to understand the efforts of these Christian Darwinists who have tried to reconcile religious doctrines with scientific theories, by analysing their activities and arguments in the context of the tradition of natural theology and the spread of Darwinian Revolution.
But “Christian Darwinism” is not the only category of my concern, for the appellation is not definitely designated largely because Darwinism is not a monolithic theory. Almost everyone who reads Darwin’s The Origin of Species(1859) has responded only to those parts of the book that either support or conflict with one’s own preconceived ideas. So Morse Peckham, editor of a variorum text of The Origin of Species, distinguished “Darwinism” from “Darwinisticism.” By observing Peckham’s distinction and following James Moore’s consultation in his The Post-Darwinian Controversies, I have also analysed the second category “Christian Darwinisticism”, which embodied non-Darwinian theories.
The third category, “Christian anti-Darwinism” shall be analysed in this paper together, because the usage of the term “Darwinism” have been mixed with all kinds of evolutionary theory including Lamarckism and Spencerism. There have been many scientists until 1930s, who accepted organic evolution, in spite of objecting Darwin’s theory of natural selection. For example, Richard Owen who have comprehensively established homology, has formulated a theory of theistic evolution remaining a staunch opponent of Darwin.
So all the three appellations, “Christian Darwinism”, “Christian Darwinisticism” and “Christian anti-Darwinism” shall be discussed comparatively within a broader category, “theistic evolutionism.” In the result, the subject of this paper has the common accommodationist position with Michael Ruse’s Can a Darwinian Be a Christian?
But “Christian Darwinism” is not the only category of my concern, for the appellation is not definitely designated largely because Darwinism is not a monolithic theory. Almost everyone who reads Darwin’s The Origin of Species(1859) has responded only to those parts of the book that either support or conflict with one’s own preconceived ideas. So Morse Peckham, editor of a variorum text of The Origin of Species, distinguished “Darwinism” from “Darwinisticism.” By observing Peckham’s distinction and following James Moore’s consultation in his The Post-Darwinian Controversies, I have also analysed the second category “Christian Darwinisticism”, which embodied non-Darwinian theories.
The third category, “Christian anti-Darwinism” shall be analysed in this paper together, because the usage of the term “Darwinism” have been mixed with all kinds of evolutionary theory including Lamarckism and Spencerism. There have been many scientists until 1930s, who accepted organic evolution, in spite of objecting Darwin’s theory of natural selection. For example, Richard Owen who have comprehensively established homology, has formulated a theory of theistic evolution remaining a staunch opponent of Darwin.
So all the three appellations, “Christian Darwinism”, “Christian Darwinisticism” and “Christian anti-Darwinism” shall be discussed comparatively within a broader category, “theistic evolutionism.” In the result, the subject of this paper has the common accommodationist position with Michael Ruse’s Can a Darwinian Be a Christian?
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기독교 다윈주의 : 역사적 개념화
Ⅲ. 기독교 반다윈주의와 진화 : 오언과 아가시
Ⅳ. 유형화 시론(試論)
Ⅴ. 자연신학과 진보, 그리고 기독교 다윈주의
Ⅵ. 진화와 목적론: 라이트와 미바트
Ⅶ. 결론: 미래세대에 대한 헉슬리의 기대
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 성영곤 / 1998 / 과학과 종교 / 한국과학사학회지 20 (2)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 성영곤 / 2009 / 다윈, 다윈주의, 그리고 종교 / 한국과학사학회지 31 (2) : 325 ~ 357
3. [단행본] - Bebbington, David W. / 1999 / Science and Evangelical Theology in Britain from Wesley to Orr, In Evangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective / Oxford Univ. Press
4. [단행본] - 남궁용 / 1999 / 챨스 다윈 / 전파과학사
5. [단행본] - 피터 보울러 / 2008 / 현대과학의 풍경 1․2 / 궁리
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 성영곤 / 2009 / 다윈, 다윈주의, 그리고 종교 / 한국과학사학회지 31 (2) : 325 ~ 357
3. [단행본] - Bebbington, David W. / 1999 / Science and Evangelical Theology in Britain from Wesley to Orr, In Evangelicals and Science in Historical Perspective / Oxford Univ. Press
4. [단행본] - 남궁용 / 1999 / 챨스 다윈 / 전파과학사
5. [단행본] - 피터 보울러 / 2008 / 현대과학의 풍경 1․2 / 궁리
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
로마제국 시대 유대 사회의 중형재판권에 관한 연구
박찬웅
신학논단
2017
.09
억압된 타자에 대한 여성신학 탐구 : 심층심리학의 관점에서 보는 신학 담론에 내재된 타자((m)other) 이해
김수연
신학논단
2017
.09
죽음에 대한 그리스도교적 해석의 실존론적 재구성과 그 함의 : 죄성에서 필멸성으로 전환하기
박욱주
신학논단
2017
.06
월터 브루그만의 저항적 안식일론에 관한 고찰과 평가
김은배
,
백근철
신학논단
2017
.06
에른스트 트뢸취의 ‘기독교의 절대성’ 비판과 역사적 기독교의 재구성
강병오
신학연구
2016
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-205-000841401