지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper focuses on the relationship between ‘plurality and unity in the configuration of the Chinese nation’ and Chinese mythology. Meanwhile, it explores the Chinese identity and self-recognition in a historical context.
The introduction of western concept of myth in the early 20th century led to the birth of Chinese mythology. Therefore, Greek myths have generally been regarded as the standard in Chinese mythology. Over the past 100 years in the academic circle in China, the issue of ‘historization of myth’ has been a heated topic because Chinese myths are very short, which indicates that they are not complete. Anyway, in the past 100 years, a great amount of academic achievements have been made in theoretical study in the field of Chinese mythology. Finally, the academic ideal of creating a Chinese mythological system has almost been accomplished at the end of 20th century. The myths of the minority nationalities with tremendous vigor have been regarded as a treasure house of Chinese myths in the process of myth-building, the foundations of a national identity. The Chinese mythologists assert that the all myths of 56 nationalities constitute integral resources of Chinese myths. Their perspective is based on the concept of 多元一體(plurality and unity) and 和而不同(harmony and difference) in which the emphasis is on ‘unity’ and ‘harmony’.
In the 21st century, China’s rise draws the affirmation of traditional culture and makes a revolutionary change in Chinese mythology. Today, many Chinese scholars are seeing Chinese myths in terms of their own point of view. They believe that they don’t have to compare Chinese myths to Greek myths anymore because the concept of ‘mythistoty’ help them look at Chinese myths in a new perspective. In a mythistoty context, the concept of myth, as the gene of culture, is much broader than that of literature. Chinese scholars begin to explore Chinese myths and culture newly from the perspective of mythological history, and from the standpoint of Chinese culture.
The re-study on the concept of myth is the academic outcome from Chinese people’s cultural consciousness concerned with overcoming orientalism, but we must guard against Chinese cultural hegemony. In this context, I think we should put a strong emphasis on ‘plurality’ and ‘difference’.
The introduction of western concept of myth in the early 20th century led to the birth of Chinese mythology. Therefore, Greek myths have generally been regarded as the standard in Chinese mythology. Over the past 100 years in the academic circle in China, the issue of ‘historization of myth’ has been a heated topic because Chinese myths are very short, which indicates that they are not complete. Anyway, in the past 100 years, a great amount of academic achievements have been made in theoretical study in the field of Chinese mythology. Finally, the academic ideal of creating a Chinese mythological system has almost been accomplished at the end of 20th century. The myths of the minority nationalities with tremendous vigor have been regarded as a treasure house of Chinese myths in the process of myth-building, the foundations of a national identity. The Chinese mythologists assert that the all myths of 56 nationalities constitute integral resources of Chinese myths. Their perspective is based on the concept of 多元一體(plurality and unity) and 和而不同(harmony and difference) in which the emphasis is on ‘unity’ and ‘harmony’.
In the 21st century, China’s rise draws the affirmation of traditional culture and makes a revolutionary change in Chinese mythology. Today, many Chinese scholars are seeing Chinese myths in terms of their own point of view. They believe that they don’t have to compare Chinese myths to Greek myths anymore because the concept of ‘mythistoty’ help them look at Chinese myths in a new perspective. In a mythistoty context, the concept of myth, as the gene of culture, is much broader than that of literature. Chinese scholars begin to explore Chinese myths and culture newly from the perspective of mythological history, and from the standpoint of Chinese culture.
The re-study on the concept of myth is the academic outcome from Chinese people’s cultural consciousness concerned with overcoming orientalism, but we must guard against Chinese cultural hegemony. In this context, I think we should put a strong emphasis on ‘plurality’ and ‘difference’.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 중화민족 다원일체론과 중국신화학의 만남
3. ‘言必稱希臘’에서 ‘言必稱中華’로
4. 和而不同?
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-820-001107856