메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Analysis of the GHG reduction potential and cost effectiveness of the fuel switching Korea Voluntary Emission Reduction project
Recommendations
Search
Questions

연료전환 온실가스감축사업(KVER)의 감축잠재력 및 비용효과 분석

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Yeon-Sang Lee (에너지관리공단) 윤화영 (동국대학교)
Journal
Korea Society of Energy&Climate Change Journal of Energy & Climate Change Vol.7 No.1 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2012.4
Pages
17 - 33 (17page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Analysis of the GHG reduction potential and cost effectiveness of the fuel switching Korea Voluntary Emission Reduction project
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Korea has introduced the "Framework act on low carbon, green growth" in hope of controling the amount of GHG emission, through which it expects to reduce 30% of the expected GHG emission by 2020. In order to fulfill the aforementioned objectives more efficiently, all of major companies as well as small and medium-sized enterprises are required to take action for GHG emission reductions. The study has been conducted to analyze the GHG reduction potential and cost effectiveness using fuel switching methodology of the KVER project. We studied 386 companies that are currently using Bunker-C oil as their primary fuel and supposed they would replace it with LNG. The reference data for this study were the outcomes of KVER project in 2010 and energy consumption data which amounted to 3,054 digitally. Through this study, we found out that the total cost of Bunker-C oil consumption is much cheaper than that of LNG. However, when it came to the GHG emission reductions, LNG turned out to be more favorable. We learned that the practice of fuel switching methodology would result in reducing 650 million tons of CO2 emissions which is 2.6% of the amount of GHG reduction target in 2020.

Contents

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적 고찰
3. 온실가스 감축잠재력 및 비용효과 분석
4. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

References (13)

Add References

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-563-001146666