지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Rhetoric is the art of finding diverse modes of persuasion: it employs not only logos, but ethos and pathos as well. In order to achieve such a goal of persuasion, the speaker makes the most of his or her personal character and appearance, that is ethos. The fact is logos does not speak itself, but should be spoken by the speaker with some specific character. Since logos is embodied as such, the question of who does speak is as important as the message itself. Aristotle said, "we believe good men more fully and more readily than others." In order to win the case the speaker does everything in his or her own power to appear good, even hiding his or her evil intention. And it happens that audience is beguiled by such false appearance. This danger of ethos has been at the core of philosophical speculations, along with the question of how to shun off or regulate the possible misuse of embodiment. Platonic logocentrism disapproved ethic embodiment of any kind. But Aristotle proposed to regulate ethic embodiment by the representative rule of correspondence or propriety, later named "decorum." Decorum is the norm regulating the fitness between logos and ethos, or between characters, actions, and style of narration. But the breakdown of this convention of decorum with the rise of enlightenment or modernity turned the trend toward disembodied logos. This paper has two aims, one being to trace the problematic history of ethic embodiment in rhetoric by focusing on Plato, Aristotle, and Kant, and the other, to answer the question why ethos becomes the center of persuasion in this age of postmodernism.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-802-001207019