메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The Development of 'Post-war Historiography' in Japan and Kajimura's Unfinished HistoriographyHow the State and the People were (Re)Discovered
Recommendations
Search
Questions

일본 '전후 역사학'의 전개와 미완의 가지무라(梶村) 사학 : 국가와 민중은 어떻게 (재)발견되었는가

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Tobe, Hideaki (도쿄 게이자이(東京經濟) 대학)
Journal
Asiatic Reaserch Institute, Korea University The Journal of Asiatic Studies Vol.149 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2012.9
Pages
37 - 64 (30page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The Development of 'Post-war Historiography' in Japan and Kajimura's Unfinished HistoriographyHow the State and the People were (Re)Discovered
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
It is necessary to understand Japanese social science in the late 20th century, especially the academic movement called ‘post-war historiography(戰後歷史學)’, to capture the changes of Kajimura’s research agenda and methodical viewpoint. I set Kajimura’s research on the modern history of Korea against the background of Japanese research on history and tried to review it based on my research on the history of historiography.
In fact, Kajimura played an important role in creating the theory of the East Asian world which was presented by the Historical Science Society of Japan(歷史學硏究會), and utilized it in of his own research on Korean history. Even though it is beyond doubt that he was stimulated by the people’s movement of contemporary Korea, first and foremost, Kajimura would not have been able to develop the conception of the history of the people after the late 1970’s, had he not conducted research on the history of people’s struggle(人民鬪爭史) and the history of people’s thought(民衆思想史) which were among the big schools of Japanese historiography at the time. Based on his research, Kajimura kept trying to improve his own methodical viewpoint until shortly before his death, and stroved to paint an overall picture of the modern history of Korea which combined the two focuses, the state and the people.
I tried to determined how Kajimura’s deepening of his immanent development theory was related with trend in Japanese and world historiography, by tracing the above points from the viewpoint of the history of historiography. At the same time, I paid attention to the meaning of Kajimura’s historiography in the context of the history of historiography as well as the historiography on Korea, and explained why Kajimura’s historiography is still relevant.

Contents

I. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 가지무라는 어떻게 잊혀졌는가
Ⅲ. ‘내재적 발전론’과 전후 역사학
Ⅳ . 가지무라의 내재적 발전론의 심화?변용을 재촉한 두 가지 요인
Ⅴ. 1980년대의 심화 - 미완의 가지무라 사학
Ⅵ. 마치며
참고문헌

References (0)

Add References

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-001280142