메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Young Jae Jung (Hanyang University College of Medicine) Hyang Ran Lee (Hanyang University College of Medicine) Oh Jung Kwon (Hanyang University College of Medicine)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Vol.83 No.2
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
69 - 74 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: We wished to compare the clinical effectiveness of cystatin C (CyC) and serum creatinine (sCr) to assess renal function in renal transplantation patients. Methods: We compared the clinical effectiveness of CyC with that of the sCr to estimate 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (CrCl) in 72 adult recipients who underwent renal transplantation from January 2001 to December 2008. We analyzed the data in terms of accuracy, bias, precision and sensitivity as a function of length of time posttransplantation and CrCl value. Results: The patients were divided into four groups according to CrCl value <30, <60, <90, and ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP>. The corresponding Cr-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates had accuracies of 0.71, 0.906, 0.963, and 1.00 within 50% of the reference, with biases (mean percentage errors) of 4.7, 5.32, -5.79, -31.33 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP>, and precisions (mean absolute percentage errors) of 7.57, 10.03, 14.52, and 31.33 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP>, respectively. The CyC-based GFR estimates had accuracies of 0.35, 0.79, 0.93, and 0.67 within 50% of the reference, respectively, with biases of 15.03, 13.37, -5.58, and -34.79 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP> and precisions of 15.03, 14.80, 17.91, and 34.79 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP>. The sensitivity for detecting GFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP> was higher for CyC (0.96, 1, and 0.95) than for Cr (0.77, 0.75, and 0.82). Conclusion: CyC is a more sensitive indicator of low GFR (CrCl <60 mL/min/1.73 m<SUP>2</SUP>) than sCr. However, CyC-based GFR estimates are restrictive data, and are neither accurate nor specific. Therefore, to evaluate renal function, we may need a revised CyC-based GFR formula and close monitoring of sCr.

목차

INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-514-001417136