메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이호용 (단국대)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제38집
발행연도
2012.5
수록면
213 - 239 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Advertisement has profit-making function but get solved information asymmetry between supplier and demander about goods and services to do best useful selection. However, sometimes by the character of demand object advertisement is restricted. Excess advertisement can hurt selection possibility, Representative of this is medical advertising. Medical is as typical field in that “consumer’s ignorance” act, evils of so called medical nemesis occur easily. Korea loosen regulation of medical advertising widely after medical advertising on medical law is unconstitutional by Constitutional Court in 2005. Medical law reformation of Japan effect on this fairly.
In Japan, 1992 when information society begin, through the second revised medical law, medical advertising is deregulated to some degree to cope with information society. In this revision the viewpoint of “To be accepted is to be admitted and the others are banned” is emphasized. In the third revised medical law of 1997 medical advertising is deregulated in view point of promotion of medical information “in sides of patients.” At that time “informed consent” had been emphasized in the same reason. In the 4th revised medical law of 2001 medical advertising is deregulated as following, homepage-address of medical agency, medical treatment methods, the number of operation. In the 5th revised medical law of 2007 in the view point of medical consumer protection medical information and advertising deregulation is tried of suffers to select more profer medical agency. Specially regulation system of objects of medical advertising was changed from list-up to general regualtion, that is most characteristic contents of this revision. In theory study on medical advertising regulation in judicial case and academic world, “medical advertising as commercial expression, if its truth is guaranteed, is secured about the same as the freedom of expression.”has been discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 일본의 의료광고 규제의 연혁
Ⅲ. 일본 의료법에 따른 의료광고 규제의 취지와 범위
Ⅳ. 일본의 학설과 판례에 나타난 의료광고규제-영리적 표현법리를 중심으로-
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-002627970