메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이병련 (고려대학교)
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 역사와 담론 第62輯
발행연도
2012.4
수록면
139 - 181 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A recent trend in the Public Teacher Appointment Examination of South Korea seems to reflect an effort to change the examination from the multiple-choice pattern into an essay-type pattern which tests one’s writing capacity. A review of history education in other countries may provide important insights to South Korea. In this context, this article introduces the Abitur history test question, which is a partial requirement for the degree of Gymnasium (equivalent to high school diploma in Korea) in Germany. This paper also presents “The Unified Administration Guide on the History Curriculum of the Abitur,” a decision by the Conference of the Cultural Ministers of the Federal Republic of Germany. With this ‘Administration Guide,’ one can understand not only the pattern and contents of the history test but also the aim of history education in Germany. In the Federal Republic of Germany, the goal of history education is to enhance students’ understanding of history, i.e., to help develop students’ ‘capacity to interprete history independently.’ This includes ‘the fact competence (Sachkompetenz), ‘the methods competence (methodskompetence),’ and ‘the competence of judgment.’ In order to evaluate the examinee’s competence, it also requires three levels of understanding. The first level is the reproduction or summary of knowledge; the second requires reorganization and transfer; and the third includes reflection and problem solving. From the first level to the third, the degree of difficulty and independence ascends. A clear distinction of the German Abitur history examination from that of South Korea is that the former demands the examinee’s competence in reasoning and judgement. And that has a very important implication for the history examination system in South Korea.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 아비투어 시험 통합 관리지침
3. 시험문제의 종류와 형태
4. 평가기준
5. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-002669691