지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Wittgenstein thinks that the problems of philosophy come from the misunderstanding of the logic and grammar of our language. It is something that can be resolved with the correct logical point of view or perspicuous perspective. His philosophical work aims to reveal the illicitness of the philosophical problems and to dissolve those problems by the philosophical elucidation. He carries through the way of critique of language.
It is widely acknowledged that Wittgenstein"s work is punctuated by a radical shift dividing it into an early and late period. Nevertheless, while from a doctrinal point of view this would seem to be undeniable, the possibility remains that Wittgenstein"s work reveals the continuity of the development of a certain problematic. Now, This is suggested by the same method in early and late period. For the more, his method duplicate the process to elucidate the problems and purpose to discover. This is a philosophizing on the way(μετ? οδ??) to the purpose.
This structure of philosophical method is developed by oppositional relations. This composed of two axis what can be said and what cannot be said. The world be logical and ethical form. Logic make what can be said been as a foundation of world, ethics let what cannot be said possible as foundation role in life. Therefore logic as a foundation of world and ethics as a foundation of life are rounded what can be said and what cannot be said as a whole. Formal language and ordinary language are in communion with what can be said. Wittgenstein"s philosophical method could be the way to show limit of language and beyond of limit of language at the same time. The philosophical problems which were fallen under
a language spell were banished to philosophical field as soon as turn out to be pseudo-problems. Duplication between horizon of logic and life present world of meaning from horizon of logic and life. Now, we can clarify the division what we can said and what we cannot said. In conclusion, Wittgenstein can be said to have presented with a philosophical method to analyze the structure of world by way of showing and description.
It is widely acknowledged that Wittgenstein"s work is punctuated by a radical shift dividing it into an early and late period. Nevertheless, while from a doctrinal point of view this would seem to be undeniable, the possibility remains that Wittgenstein"s work reveals the continuity of the development of a certain problematic. Now, This is suggested by the same method in early and late period. For the more, his method duplicate the process to elucidate the problems and purpose to discover. This is a philosophizing on the way(μετ? οδ??) to the purpose.
This structure of philosophical method is developed by oppositional relations. This composed of two axis what can be said and what cannot be said. The world be logical and ethical form. Logic make what can be said been as a foundation of world, ethics let what cannot be said possible as foundation role in life. Therefore logic as a foundation of world and ethics as a foundation of life are rounded what can be said and what cannot be said as a whole. Formal language and ordinary language are in communion with what can be said. Wittgenstein"s philosophical method could be the way to show limit of language and beyond of limit of language at the same time. The philosophical problems which were fallen under
a language spell were banished to philosophical field as soon as turn out to be pseudo-problems. Duplication between horizon of logic and life present world of meaning from horizon of logic and life. Now, we can clarify the division what we can said and what we cannot said. In conclusion, Wittgenstein can be said to have presented with a philosophical method to analyze the structure of world by way of showing and description.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 철학적 방법의 의미
3. 철학적 방법의 구조
4. 철학적 방법의 도식
5. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0