지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Louis the XIV and Jeongjo lived in different time periods of the 17th and 18th centuries, respectively. Nonetheless, a comparative study about these two persons is possible because they lived in historically similar times, which went through a structural transformation involving the political relationship between the king and his subjects. Louis the XIV is a representative king of European absolute monarchy. However, the Sun King myth of Louis the XIV was broken as revealed in recent scholarship. The absolute monarchy of Louis the XIV was not a model case of absolute monarchy, but a specific epochal product of France. This historical deconstruction of the myth of an absolute monarchy does not reject the fact that absolutism played a decisive role in the formation of the modern state and the state reason. The absolute monarchy is still a valid ideal type in M. Weber’s sense, who explained the procession from the monarchical state to the modern state.
The question remains however if this kind of ideal type of absolute monarchy is a universal historical criterium to explain the transition to the modern state. In relation to this ideal type, there have been scholarly efforts that compare Jeongjo to the enlightened absolute monarch of the 18th century beyond the absolute monarch of 17th century’s Europe. Can we, however, confirm the possibility of Korean internal development into a modern state simply through the favorable evaluation of King Jeongjo’s reform policies? This article examines the meaning and meaninglessness of this kind of comparative study through contrasting Louis the XIV and Jeongjo.
The question remains however if this kind of ideal type of absolute monarchy is a universal historical criterium to explain the transition to the modern state. In relation to this ideal type, there have been scholarly efforts that compare Jeongjo to the enlightened absolute monarch of the 18th century beyond the absolute monarch of 17th century’s Europe. Can we, however, confirm the possibility of Korean internal development into a modern state simply through the favorable evaluation of King Jeongjo’s reform policies? This article examines the meaning and meaninglessness of this kind of comparative study through contrasting Louis the XIV and Jeongjo.
목차
Ⅰ. 비교의 목적
Ⅱ. 태양왕과 ‘바로크 국가’로서 절대왕정
Ⅲ. 조선의 절대군주로서 만천명월주인옹
Ⅳ. ‘조선의 18세기’ vs. ‘18세기의 조선’
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-002849148