지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the conduct of international relations, nations still at times resort to armed force to attain particular outcomes. In the 21st century to date, two new justifications for the potential use of armed force have been introduced. They are the Bush Doctrine of preemption, articulated in The United States" National Security Strategy of 2002, and the United Nation"s doctrine of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). This paper will explain these two doctrines and subsequently examine them through the lens of jus cogens - the idea that some rules of international law are of such fundamental importance that deviating from them are prohibited. The intent is not to suggest that either of these doctrines will anytime soon rise to the level of of jus cogens in international law. Instead, the goal of this paper is to determine, by application of the rigorous requirements of jus cogens analysis, whether either of these two doctrines are legally viable in the long term. This analysis should reveal the strengths and weaknesses of both doctrines and whether either doctrine will someday attain general long-term acceptance in international law.
Part I of this paper introduces the plan for the analysis. Part II examines how the Bush Doctrine of preemption relies on the redefining of a critical word that weakens the legal viability of the doctrine. Part III takes a similar look at the legal basis for R2P and identifies general categories of supporters and opponents of that doctrine. In Part IV, the jus cogens filter will be applied to both doctrines with the results of that analysis provided in the Conclusion.
Part I of this paper introduces the plan for the analysis. Part II examines how the Bush Doctrine of preemption relies on the redefining of a critical word that weakens the legal viability of the doctrine. Part III takes a similar look at the legal basis for R2P and identifies general categories of supporters and opponents of that doctrine. In Part IV, the jus cogens filter will be applied to both doctrines with the results of that analysis provided in the Conclusion.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. A Doctrine of New Preemption?
Ⅲ. R2P from the Ashes of Humanitarian Intervention
Ⅳ. New Preemption, R2P, and Jus Cogens
Ⅴ. Conclusion
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
리비아에 대한 ‘보호책임(R2P)’적용 사례 연구 : 북한에 주는 교훈과 시사점
박동형
국제정치논총
2012
.09
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) after Libya : Practical Implication for North Korea
Shin-wha Lee
국제관계연구
2013
.04
국가실패와 보호책임(R2P)의 북한 적용가능성
이신화
한국정치학회보
2012
.03
보호책임의 내용과 법적 성격
서철원
법학논총
2012
.01
North Korea and the Responsibility to Protect : Challenges and Opportunities
Yoojin Rhee
한국국제정치학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2010
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0