지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.12
- 수록면
- 1,209 - 1,262 (54page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article focuses on comparing the Legal system of the Farmland Lease among the three countries(Japan, Germany, and France). Japan has the civil law as general law, while it has the japanese farmland act as special law in field of farmland transactions. Germany has the BGB and the german Landpachtverkehrsgesetz (LPachtVG). France has the Code civil and the Code rural. Thus each country has its own legal system protecting the farmland lessee.
There are several development patterns regarding the legal system of the farmland lease. In the first stage, principle of freedom of contract has ruled through the civil law. And then each country has established the special laws regarding the protection of the farmland lessee at the time of the second World War. Today each country has been trying to accomplish the harmony between the lessor and the lessee.
There are some phenomena of restriction on the farmland lease. Japan has the executive permission under the farmland act. Germany has the farmland lease reporting system. And then France has the similar permission system(e.g. prefet; superficie minimum d"Installation: SMI). This article also addresses the main legal points for example, duration of lease, management of rent, opposing power of the lessee, and the dispute settlement system.
This study might be able to approximate some solutions to the problems of the korean farmland lease. Korean Farmland Act 1996 provided the concrete rules concerning the protection of the farmland lessee. But those rules has disappeared through the several reforms, and thus there are some gaps between the law and the real transactions. This comparative study can make up the fault of the korean farmland legal system.
There are several development patterns regarding the legal system of the farmland lease. In the first stage, principle of freedom of contract has ruled through the civil law. And then each country has established the special laws regarding the protection of the farmland lessee at the time of the second World War. Today each country has been trying to accomplish the harmony between the lessor and the lessee.
There are some phenomena of restriction on the farmland lease. Japan has the executive permission under the farmland act. Germany has the farmland lease reporting system. And then France has the similar permission system(e.g. prefet; superficie minimum d"Installation: SMI). This article also addresses the main legal points for example, duration of lease, management of rent, opposing power of the lessee, and the dispute settlement system.
This study might be able to approximate some solutions to the problems of the korean farmland lease. Korean Farmland Act 1996 provided the concrete rules concerning the protection of the farmland lessee. But those rules has disappeared through the several reforms, and thus there are some gaps between the law and the real transactions. This comparative study can make up the fault of the korean farmland legal system.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 日本 사례
Ⅲ. 獨逸 사례
Ⅳ. 프랑스 사례
Ⅴ. 우리나라에 주는 시사점
Ⅵ. 글을 맺으며
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (46)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
농지의 소유제도 연구
김대명
법학연구
2009
.02
외국의 국토관리 및 농지제도
김수석
,
박시현
,
채광석
외 2명
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2010
.12
콜롬비아의 국내실향민(IDP : Internally Displaced People) 증가원인 : 아프로-아메리카공동체를 중심으로
차경미
,
최병일
코기토
2012
.08
일제하 간척농지 확충을 통한 공동체적 자원이용방식 : 전남 완도 新農場과 正道新農組合의 사례
선영란
도서문화
1998
.12
충북 조건불리지역 농지의 효율적 이용방안
박종섭
,
박경국
,
류을렬
지역정책연구
2000
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0