지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper will give a general overview of the policies about sea crossing in both Joseon and Japan in the late seventeenth century and examine the reality of sea crossing by people in both countries, ranging from the eighteenth century through the nineteenth century over Ulleungdo(鬱陵島).
After the eighteenth century, Joseon’s policy towards Ulleungdo revolved around Suto Policy (搜討政策) and Ulleungdo’s regional product acquisition activities. Suto(搜討) by a periphery administrator began to be implemented on a regular basis from 1699 and was officially abolished in 1894 as the Joseon government changed its Ulleungdo policy into a migration policy by pioneering. Even after the enhancement of the Suto Policy, sea crossing to Ulleungdo continued. Especially in the late eighteenth century, the number of cases of entering the island for gathering ginseng(人蔘) by the public increased. The Joseon government once dispatched both Suto officers(搜討官) and people digging ginseng(採蔘軍) together to Ulleungdo to take advantage of wild ginseng from the island.
Meanwhile, even after the Edo Bakufu prohibited on the Dottori Clan(鳥取藩) the sea crossing to Ulleungdo in 1696, a fact that local residents of Oki(隱岐), Nagato(長門), Iwami(石見) accessed the island is revealed.
Among them, a case of Imazuya Hachiemon(今津屋八右衛門) from the Hamada Clan(浜田藩) of sea crossing to Ulleungdo which was found in 1836 let the re-inspection of passage problems in conjunction with a power struggle in the Edo Bakufu. As Hachiemon was only a commoner of the Hamada Clan, his sea crossing was in fact pursued with permit and assistance of the Hamada Clan Agency.
The Sentencing of the Edo Bakufu(江戶幕府) has a record of Hachiemon’s violation against the prohibition of sea crossing to foreign countries. However, there is another record that Hachiemon sold Japanese swords to foreigners. It could be possible that there was a huge possibility that Hamada Clan took some profit created by the sea crossing to Ulleungdo as the sea crossing was permitted by the Hamada Clan Agency.
Another thing to note in this case is that the shogunate promulgated the prohibition of sea crossing to Ulleungdo again in the form of national laws in the following year 1837. It may be because the Edo Bakufu recognised the need to emphasise on the reason for illegality and its significance of the sea crossing to Ulleungdo on a nationwide scale. In this law, both facts were specified that Ulleungdo belonged to Joseon and the act of sea crossing to Ulleungdo was against the ban on the sea crossing to foreign countries.
After the eighteenth century, Joseon’s policy towards Ulleungdo revolved around Suto Policy (搜討政策) and Ulleungdo’s regional product acquisition activities. Suto(搜討) by a periphery administrator began to be implemented on a regular basis from 1699 and was officially abolished in 1894 as the Joseon government changed its Ulleungdo policy into a migration policy by pioneering. Even after the enhancement of the Suto Policy, sea crossing to Ulleungdo continued. Especially in the late eighteenth century, the number of cases of entering the island for gathering ginseng(人蔘) by the public increased. The Joseon government once dispatched both Suto officers(搜討官) and people digging ginseng(採蔘軍) together to Ulleungdo to take advantage of wild ginseng from the island.
Meanwhile, even after the Edo Bakufu prohibited on the Dottori Clan(鳥取藩) the sea crossing to Ulleungdo in 1696, a fact that local residents of Oki(隱岐), Nagato(長門), Iwami(石見) accessed the island is revealed.
Among them, a case of Imazuya Hachiemon(今津屋八右衛門) from the Hamada Clan(浜田藩) of sea crossing to Ulleungdo which was found in 1836 let the re-inspection of passage problems in conjunction with a power struggle in the Edo Bakufu. As Hachiemon was only a commoner of the Hamada Clan, his sea crossing was in fact pursued with permit and assistance of the Hamada Clan Agency.
The Sentencing of the Edo Bakufu(江戶幕府) has a record of Hachiemon’s violation against the prohibition of sea crossing to foreign countries. However, there is another record that Hachiemon sold Japanese swords to foreigners. It could be possible that there was a huge possibility that Hamada Clan took some profit created by the sea crossing to Ulleungdo as the sea crossing was permitted by the Hamada Clan Agency.
Another thing to note in this case is that the shogunate promulgated the prohibition of sea crossing to Ulleungdo again in the form of national laws in the following year 1837. It may be because the Edo Bakufu recognised the need to emphasise on the reason for illegality and its significance of the sea crossing to Ulleungdo on a nationwide scale. In this law, both facts were specified that Ulleungdo belonged to Joseon and the act of sea crossing to Ulleungdo was against the ban on the sea crossing to foreign countries.
#울릉도
#수토정책
#죽도도해면허
#도돗토리번
#하마다번
#죽도도해금지오후레
#鬱陵島
#搜討政策
#竹嶋渡海免許
#鳥取藩
#浜田藩
#竹嶋渡海禁止御觸
#Ulleungdo
#Joseon's policy of the residents moved to the mainland from Ulleungdo
#Edo Bakufu's permission of sea crossing to Ulleungdo
#Suto officers
#Dottori Clan
#Hamada Clan
#Edo Bakufu's prohibition of sea crossing to Ulleungdo
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 17세기의 울릉도와 朝日관계
Ⅲ. 18세기 이후 조선의 울릉도 관리
Ⅳ. 18세기 이후 일본의 울릉도 도해
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1693년 조선인의 돗토리번(鳥取藩) 연행 사건과 쓰시마번(對馬藩)
윤유숙
동양사학연구
2013
.06
근세 일본의 성소순례와 伊勢參宮
朴晉熯
동양사학연구
2012
.06
다이쇼기 일본 여성운동의 조직화와 노선 갈등 : 『女性同盟』을 통해 보는〈新婦人協会〉(1919～1922)의 역사와 의의
이은경
동양사학연구
2011
.09
근세 돗토리번 (鳥取藩) 町人의 울릉도 도해
尹裕淑
한일관계사연구
2012
.08
1920년대 전국수평사와 일본기독교계의 상호인식 : ‘해방의 복음’과 ‘증오의 복음’을 중심으로
崔京洵
동양사학연구
2012
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-001707115