지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Regime transformation after the Cold War has been linked to personal or group interests under a certain communist regime, with some scholars arguing it leads to the western style of democracy and others claiming it creates something different. This article offers an imagination, based upon the assumption that moral norms of the regime is the underlying cause for regime transformation, about the more just and more peaceful regime transformation.
Moral norms construct morally good character and right behaviours in the regime. Throughout the history, they has been used to foster favorable outcomes of the leaders, not of the people in the regime. That is why there are always possibilities of hypocrisy. This hypocrisy loses the leaders’ power and leads to regime transformation as it is revealed, by undercutting their legitimacy. Then, how could we imagine a transformation to a totally new regime, which is just and peaceful, when we always have to suspect our leader’s hypocrisy? Is not it just circulatory?
To answer that question, this article broadens the scope of the regime transformation research, suggesting a meeting place for social science and theology. Social science is helpful for us to understand our problems in this world, but it has its limits of imagining the future. Whereas, theology gives us hope and imaginations for the better future with God, the Kingdom of God, though many times the outcomes of the theological research do not seem very concrete as those of social science do. In this regards, this article argues that social scientific research can show us the limitation of moral norms constructed by human beings in just and peaceful regime transformation as theology can give us the possibility of the new imagination in it, which is the image of god.
Moral norms construct morally good character and right behaviours in the regime. Throughout the history, they has been used to foster favorable outcomes of the leaders, not of the people in the regime. That is why there are always possibilities of hypocrisy. This hypocrisy loses the leaders’ power and leads to regime transformation as it is revealed, by undercutting their legitimacy. Then, how could we imagine a transformation to a totally new regime, which is just and peaceful, when we always have to suspect our leader’s hypocrisy? Is not it just circulatory?
To answer that question, this article broadens the scope of the regime transformation research, suggesting a meeting place for social science and theology. Social science is helpful for us to understand our problems in this world, but it has its limits of imagining the future. Whereas, theology gives us hope and imaginations for the better future with God, the Kingdom of God, though many times the outcomes of the theological research do not seem very concrete as those of social science do. In this regards, this article argues that social scientific research can show us the limitation of moral norms constructed by human beings in just and peaceful regime transformation as theology can give us the possibility of the new imagination in it, which is the image of god.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 체제 전환에서 이익과 도덕
Ⅲ. 도덕의 역할: 이행인가, 전환인가?
Ⅳ. 체제 전환과 도덕의 한계
Ⅴ. 체제전환과 하나님 나라
Ⅵ. 나오며
참고문헌
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
저출산･고령화 시대의 광역권 인구이동 : 저출산･고령화 시대의 광역권 인구이동
박이택
아세아연구
2012
.06
전후 일본 정부의 일계인에 대한 인식 변화 : 1960-80년대 재외 국민 정책과의 관계를 중심으로
최민경
아세아연구
2012
.06
재한(在韓)원폭피해자 문제에 대한 한일 양국의 인식과 교섭태도(1965~1980)
김승은
아세아연구
2012
.06
대한민국 국가정보기구의 탄생과 이승만 : 1공화국기 사정국[대한관찰부]을 중심으로
박성진
,
이상호
아세아연구
2012
.06
유럽산업혁명과 동아시아 ‘대분기’(Great Divergence) 논쟁
김두진
,
이내영
아세아연구
2012
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-230-001578733