메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강경이 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국번역학회 번역학연구 번역학연구 제12권 제4호
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
7 - 32 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Multisource assessment refers to a type of evaluation conducted at different levels and on various aspects by multiple persons including supervisors, subordinates, and colleagues. It includes self-assessment as well. In this paper, the concept of multisource assessment is redefined for classroom environments. To study the educational value of multisource assessment, a multisource assessment model that leverages translation editing is used in a real classroom environment.
Class observations and survey results indicate that multisource assessment is effective as it allows rich feedback from multiple participants, creates huge amount of knowledge and advances cognitive development. Three types of multisource assessment were conducted in translation classes: Student conducts ‘self-assessment’ to review and edit his/her translation assignment from his/her own perspective; classmates carry out "peer-assessments" to assess the quality of assignments from readers’ perspective; and lecturer conducts ‘teacher’s assessment’ to give comments as a specialist. These three approaches, carried out in parallel, created synergy effect, thereby raising reliability and validity. Furthermore, students were more engaged in classroom discussions, contributing different opinions on given subjects. Some issues remain unsettled, such as ‘ensuring reliability and homogeneity of peer reviews’, ‘developing more effective self-assessment tools’, and ‘streamlining processes or adjusting assessment frequency to resolve excessive time consumption problem’. Once these issues are resolved, multisource assessment is expected to present significant educational value.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 감수작업을 통한 다면평가 모델 활용사례
4. 번역과제물 다면평가에 관한 설문조사
5. 결론
참고문헌
〔부록1〕다면평가 활용에 관한 설문
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-701-001517190