메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jeoung, Haegap (상명대학교)
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제54권 1호
발행연도
2012.2
수록면
121 - 138 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This research comparatively tries to analyze Seneca’s Medea and Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus, in terms of debunking patriarchy, not to speak of the Senecan tradition of revenge tragedy. In the two revenge plays, the playwrights leave room for self-criticism on the patriarchal hegemony, in relation to colonial imagination, at once in gender and in race. Like Medea, Tamora the foreign other is doubly colonized, sexually and racially. Remarkably, in Western culture, the colonial imagination concerning foreigners and females is overlapping each other, with imperialism overlapping with patriarchal hegemony. Here’s a meaningful voice by Aaron: “O, why should wrath be mute, and fury dumb?” This shouting for the awareness and demystification of the other is debunkingly supposed to echo in the mind of the audience, with the imperialistic patriarchy put into challenge. The shouting can be the other’s angry voice. Through it, also, the muted and dumbed Lavinia must have her voice; honor killing of Lavinia is actually a pretext for subjugating the other, a pretext
arising from the psychology of male anxiety toward the feminine other.

목차

Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-001501801