지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.7
- 수록면
- 69 - 100 (32page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper addresses the issue of science related human rights. It begins by showing how science was central yet paradoxically peripheral to the Universal Declaration of Human rights; this is followed by a discussion of the negligible impact of the Nuremberg Code, and the patient rights therein encoded, in the immediate post war. Two conclusions are drawn from these preliminary explorations. First, the interconnection between human rights and science was mediated via the sacralisation of the latter’s autonomy from social capture, which in turn limited the types of science related human rights claims that could be made. Second, the explanatory gaze of social scientists should be focused on exploring the concrete configuration of social, political, economic and cultural forces that provide human rights with social efficacy. In other words human rights need to be conceptualised as ordinary objects of sociological analysis.
These two points are further elaborated through a historical case study of the emergence of patient rights in the US, the most important science related human rights to date. This is followed by a discussion on the prospects for science related human rights in the bio and nano era by showing how the knowledge society, risk, scientific citizenship and ELSIfication (i.e. the development of research programs concerned with eliciting ethical, legal and social implications of genomics, nanotechnology, etc.) have weakened, but by no means done away with science’s once sacred autonomy. This means that there are currently new opportunities for the emergence of science related human rights claims. It is concluded that science related human rights also raise important issues regarding hybridity and the conceptualisation of human vulnerability.
These two points are further elaborated through a historical case study of the emergence of patient rights in the US, the most important science related human rights to date. This is followed by a discussion on the prospects for science related human rights in the bio and nano era by showing how the knowledge society, risk, scientific citizenship and ELSIfication (i.e. the development of research programs concerned with eliciting ethical, legal and social implications of genomics, nanotechnology, etc.) have weakened, but by no means done away with science’s once sacred autonomy. This means that there are currently new opportunities for the emergence of science related human rights claims. It is concluded that science related human rights also raise important issues regarding hybridity and the conceptualisation of human vulnerability.
목차
Introduction
Linking human tights to science in the UDHR and theNuremberg Doctors’ Trial
Making human rights ordinary
Constraining science in the postwar?
The emergence of patient rights in the US
Science’s autonomy in the knowledge Society
Human Rights in the bio and nanotech era
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (63)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Annas, George J / 1992 / The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation / Oxford University Press
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Beecher, Henry K / 1966 / Ethics and Clinical Research / The New England Journal of Medicine 274 (24) : 1354 ~ 1360
3. [단행본] - Beck,Ulrich / 1992 / Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity / Sage
4. [단행본] - Benatar, Solomon R / 2000 / The Biotechnology Era: A Story of Two Lives and Two Worlds. in Peace, Justice and Freedom: Challenges for a New Millennium / University of Alberta Press : 245 ~ 257
5. [단행본] - Beyleveld, Deryck / 2001 / Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw / Oxford University Press
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Beecher, Henry K / 1966 / Ethics and Clinical Research / The New England Journal of Medicine 274 (24) : 1354 ~ 1360
3. [단행본] - Beck,Ulrich / 1992 / Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity / Sage
4. [단행본] - Benatar, Solomon R / 2000 / The Biotechnology Era: A Story of Two Lives and Two Worlds. in Peace, Justice and Freedom: Challenges for a New Millennium / University of Alberta Press : 245 ~ 257
5. [단행본] - Beyleveld, Deryck / 2001 / Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw / Oxford University Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-331-001497655