메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Brian C. Kalt (Michigan State University)
저널정보
숭실대학교 법학연구소 법학논총 法學論叢 第27輯
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
309 - 320 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Sometimes, the professor will notify the students in advance that they are going to be called on. The professor might also include materials other than cases in the reading assignment, such as simple descriptions of the legal rules, or hypothetical problems that the students can consider before class. This is still considered "Socratic," though, because students are still expected to prepare before class, the professor will still call on them in class to present their answers, and the whole process is directed not just at teaching the rules but, again, at training the students to "think like lawyers."
Being comfortable dealing with Socratic?trained lawyers will become increasingly important, and having undergone a similar rite of passage will be helpful as well. The same goes for international legal education. As more international students comes to the U.S. for LL.M. degrees, they will benefit from having been exposed to the Socratic method before their arrival.

목차

Abstract
I . Defining the Socratic Method
II. The Origin and Purpose of the Socratic Method
III. Thinking Like a Lawyer
IV. Other Benefits of the Method
V. Drawbacks and Criticisms of the Socratic Method

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-300-001497092