메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조효원 (서울대학교)
저널정보
계명대학교 인문과학연구소 동서인문학 인문학연구 제45권
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
185 - 223 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Walter Benjamin’s famous posthumous script “On the Concept of History” still remains somehow problematic and cryptic. One may, however, resolve the riddle of the text, if we focus on the aspect of Benjamin’s Messianism. It seems to be plausible that the concept and figure of “citation” is taken as a point of departure. Karl Kraus, the famous and prodigious writer in the fin-de-siecle Vienna, enormously influenced the mode and structure of Benjaminian thoughts and writings. As a constant reader of Kraus, Benjamin borrowed the esprit and strategy from the texts of Kraus ranging of newspaper articles to literary works. However, the core of these is to be found in the method of citation. One might summarize Benjamin’s citation-concept, which he renovated from the one of Kraus, in one short sentence: “The origin is the telos [Ursprung ist das Ziel].” This sentence is quoted from Kraus’ poetical works. In a critical essay about Kraus printed in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (1931), Benjamin analyzed Krausian practices of journalistic writings and constructed a trilogy, i. e. “cosmic man [Allmensch]”, “demon [Damon]”, and “nonhuman [Unmensch]”. “Nonhuman” reveals the essence of the enigmatic figure of Benjaminian historical thoughts, Angelus Novus. It has two contradictory faces: the destructive one and the childlike one. The central thesis presented in this article suggests that these ambivalent aspects of the new angel can be confirmed in the juxtaposition of the ‘real’ Kraus and the fictional character ‘Kraus’ who appears in the novel Jakob von Gunten by Robert Walser. The real Kraus presents the destructive aspect of the new angel and the fictional Kraus the transient and fugacious one. This very ambivalence of Angelus Novus is the core of Walter Benjamin’s Messianism.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 인용하는 작가 칼 크라우스
Ⅲ. 결론: 발터 벤야민의 문학적 메시아주의
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-051-001278677