지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Notwithstanding frequent application of recent terminology, mutually-beneficial coexistence, few discussions delving practical meaning and criteria from the perspective of public administration are found. More in-dept analysis is in urgent need since applying the terminology without such discussions could lead to problematic results such as indiscreet governmental intervention, deteriorated competitiveness or rise of populism. Based on this background, we tried to redefine the terminology with sustainable co-evolution in terms of complex ecosystem and simulated the possible relationship between chauffeur and taxi service under the different scenarios to identify adequate level of regulation enaction as an exploratory application. For this purposes, we reviewed the literature about complex system and ecosystem followed by operational definition of mutually-beneficial coexistence with sustainable co-evolution. As a exemplary case, evolutionary processes of chauffeur and taxi service in terms of co-evolution are scrutinized in detail, and Lotka-Volterra model was applied to specify their co-evolutionary relationship.
As a result, it was identified that both chauffeur and taxi service could achieve sustainable co-evolution, i.e., mutually-beneficial coexistence within the extent to which regulation enaction does not bring about excessive transfer of demand from chauffeur service to taxi service. According to this study, it is necessary to put more emphasis on co-evolutionary relationship among actors and government intervention should be restricted within the limit not to disturb sustainable co-evolution of them. It is expected to contribute to specifying theoretic meaning and practical applicability of mutually-beneficial coexistence.
As a result, it was identified that both chauffeur and taxi service could achieve sustainable co-evolution, i.e., mutually-beneficial coexistence within the extent to which regulation enaction does not bring about excessive transfer of demand from chauffeur service to taxi service. According to this study, it is necessary to put more emphasis on co-evolutionary relationship among actors and government intervention should be restricted within the limit not to disturb sustainable co-evolution of them. It is expected to contribute to specifying theoretic meaning and practical applicability of mutually-beneficial coexistence.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 복잡계와 생태계의 이론적 함의
Ⅲ. 지속가능한 공진화를 통한 상생의 개념화
Ⅳ. 지속가능한 공진화 개념의 예시적 적용
Ⅴ. 결론 : 가능성과 한계
참고문헌
[부록]
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
택시서비스 품질 저하의 선행요인들에 관한 실증적 연구 : 서울지역 택시의 교통사고율을 중심으로
이상준
,
이윤숙
,
신호정
한국경영과학회지
2015
.11
소통환경의 변화와 복잡계 이론 : 사회변동에 대한 새로운 패러다임의 모색
박근서
커뮤니케이션 이론
2012
.08
대리운전의 법적 문제와 대리운전 범죄에 관한 소고
이철호
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2012
.05
복잡체계이론에 따른 전자정부 시대의 부패 통제 방안
배일섭
사회과학연구
2004
.10
복잡계 이론과 사회과학의 만남
채승병
정보 및 제어 논문집
2008
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-359-001269408