메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김미형 (상명대학교)
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제18권 제3호
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
23 - 64 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, the characteristics of differences between the postpositional particles used in place of a subject, i/ka and eun/neun, are discussed. Although i/ka has been traditionally categorized as a subjective postposition, there have been many researches about the identity of this postpositional particle, since subjective case is expressed without such particle, and eun/neun is also sometimes used. Eun/neun is known to represent a topic or the contrast when used in the place of subject. However, many preceding researches could not clearly explain the function of the two postpositions. In this research, the fact that each of the two postpositions possess different premise is explained. i/ka, in which a predicate is fixed in speaker’s cognition, selects a sister of a subject. On the other hand, eun/neun, in which a subject is fixed in speaker’s cognition, selects s sister of a predicate. Such basic premise is a main factor that enables i/ka to function as a subjective postposition and eun/neun to express the topic. In addition, because of such premise, i/ka intentionally means ‘selective designation’, and eun/neun contrast conditional on the flow of sentence. In the case of subjective clause, i/ka is used when a predicate is fixed, and eun/neun is used when a subject is fixed. Hence, when a postposition i/ka is used in the place of subject, the status of a given subject depends on a predicate. For eun/neun, the status of a given predicate depends on a subject.

목차

1. 머리말
2. ‘이/가’와 ‘은/는’의 기본 전제 분석
3. ‘이/가’와 ‘은/는’의 기능에 대한 검토
4. ‘이/가’와 ‘은/는’의 내포적 의미 검토
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (55)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-701-001231602