지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper explores the cognitive aspects of the concepts related to ‘head’ as reflected in idiom formation. It is further intended to identify the Idealized Cognitive Model (ICM) of the ‘head’ in Korean and investigate the intricate relationship between the two cognitive mechanisms, with reference to semantic extension patterns involving the term.
Metonymic extension comprises of two distinct subtypes, i.e, contextual reducing effect and active zone. The contextual reducing effect operates among the syntagmatic elements in juxtaposition by way of selecting one element to represent the whole, whereas the active zone operates paradigmatically among the polysemous elements by way of selecting one activated element to represent the partonomic or synecdoche relationship.
With reference to metaphor, this paper asserts that, departing from the widely accepted view that the body-part term ‘head’ serves as the source of the metaphoric mapping, ‘head’ often serves as the target concept. This metaphorization process is critically dependent on the preceding metonymization process whereby the ‘head’ represents its active zone, the ‘brain’, as the locus where the abstraction process of referring to cogitation or perception occurs. The conceptual metaphors with reference to the ‘head’ are instantiated as three major types: HEAD IS CONTAINER; HEAD IS MACHINE, and HEAD IS WAY; and the orientational metaphors with reference to the ‘head’ are APPEARANCE IS UP, SUBMITTED/ DISAPPOINTEDE/SHAMEFUL IS DOWN.
Metonymic extension comprises of two distinct subtypes, i.e, contextual reducing effect and active zone. The contextual reducing effect operates among the syntagmatic elements in juxtaposition by way of selecting one element to represent the whole, whereas the active zone operates paradigmatically among the polysemous elements by way of selecting one activated element to represent the partonomic or synecdoche relationship.
With reference to metaphor, this paper asserts that, departing from the widely accepted view that the body-part term ‘head’ serves as the source of the metaphoric mapping, ‘head’ often serves as the target concept. This metaphorization process is critically dependent on the preceding metonymization process whereby the ‘head’ represents its active zone, the ‘brain’, as the locus where the abstraction process of referring to cogitation or perception occurs. The conceptual metaphors with reference to the ‘head’ are instantiated as three major types: HEAD IS CONTAINER; HEAD IS MACHINE, and HEAD IS WAY; and the orientational metaphors with reference to the ‘head’ are APPEARANCE IS UP, SUBMITTED/ DISAPPOINTEDE/SHAMEFUL IS DOWN.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 관용 표현의 환유적 의미 확장
3. 관용 표현의 은유적 의미 확장
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (48)
참고문헌 신청
3. [학위논문] - 문금현 / 1996 / 국어의 관용 표현 연구 / 박사 / 서울대학교
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박만규 / 2003 / 관용표현의 범주적 정체성 확립을 위하여－의미론적 분석을 중심으로－ / 國語學 41 : 307 ~ 353
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박종갑 / 2009 / [두부(頭部)] 관련 관용 표현 연구 / 인문연구 (57) : 361 ~ 388
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 배도용 / 2002 / 우리말 ‘머리’의 의미 확장 연구 / 國語學 40 : 269 ~ 294
9. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이기동 / 1997 / 관용어, 은유 그리고 환유 I / 담화와 인지 4 (1) : 61 ~ 87
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박만규 / 2003 / 관용표현의 범주적 정체성 확립을 위하여－의미론적 분석을 중심으로－ / 國語學 41 : 307 ~ 353
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박종갑 / 2009 / [두부(頭部)] 관련 관용 표현 연구 / 인문연구 (57) : 361 ~ 388
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 배도용 / 2002 / 우리말 ‘머리’의 의미 확장 연구 / 國語學 40 : 269 ~ 294
9. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이기동 / 1997 / 관용어, 은유 그리고 환유 I / 담화와 인지 4 (1) : 61 ~ 87
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-701-001231591