메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
문지원 (대구한의대학교) 최동식 (대구한의대학교) 김상희 (경북대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第28 第1號
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
109 - 120 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, we selected Bukseong-ro 1-ga, Daegu Metropolitan City where lots of modern architecture are densely located in order to seek for ways to create modern historic and cultural streets, manufactured streetscape"s dynamic image simulation, and conducted an evaluation of streetscape by making most use of this simulation.
Streetscape"s dynamic image simulation consists of a total of five types including streetscape representing Bukseong-ro 1-ga(#1), streetscape with signboards removed and elevation of architecture reorganized(#2), and streetscape containing dominant factors of the modern Bukseong-ro streetscape by stages(#3∼#5). The result of the evaluation and analysis of street landscape is as follows: First, as a result of preference analysis, it was found that the preference of streetscape containing dominant factors of the modern streetscape was higher than that of the current streetscape, and that the average score of preference continued to rise up whenever each dominant factor was added. The most influential factors in increasing the preference included signboard and awning. Second, as a result of evaluation of streetscape (#1 and #5) image, Bukseong-ro 1-ga streetscape(#1) tended to be as disorderly and disharmonious as we can find at a modern commercial street, and streetscape containing all dominant factors(#5) kept its traditional image and at the same time it was deemed as a unified streetscape. Third, as a result of analysis of streetscape(#1 and #5)factor, in Buseong-ro 1-ga streetscape (#1), the level of factor contribution was higher in the descending order: ‘continuity’, ‘diversity’, ‘stability’, and ‘traditionality,’ whereas in the streetscape where modern streetscape"s dominance factors are all contained (#5), the level of factor contribution was higher in the descending order: ‘continuity’, ‘diversity’, and ‘originality,’ and there was a difference in street users" recognition of the environment.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적 고찰
3. 가로경관 시뮬레이션 평가 실험 설계
4. 유형별 가로경관 평가 및 분석
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-540-001227449