메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김영혜 (우석대학교)
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 50호
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
111 - 136 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article is a study on the Expressionistic characteristics of C. Dreyer’s eminent film, The Passion of Joan of Arc(1928). Though The Passion is generally categorized as an Expressionist film, many film critics and scholars see the film as a wonderful combination of 1920s’ popular European film styles--French Impressionism, Russian Montage films and German Expressionism. My purpose of this article is not to trap the film into one concrete category but to understand for what artistic purpose Dreyer used the Expressionistic elements most strongly in the film. This understanding leads to the further analysis on Andre Bazin’s severe criticism on the Expressionist films, especially 〈The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari〉(Robert Wiene, 1919). Bazin insists that the film did all possible violence to images with painted and distorted set decoration and unnatural lightings. For Bazin, film is destined to represent natural reality or at least a plausible reality which an audience can recognize as what they know in reality. Panofsky also criticizes 〈Dr. Caligari〉, saying that the film pre-stylized our reality before it faces the reality as it is. The ground what Bazin and Panofsky’s criticism steps on is that film was born out of photography, a technology which records realty as it is. According to this position, it is not surprising that psycho dramas like 〈Dr. Caligari〉 or scientific films like Melies’s 〈A Trip to the Moon〉 are treated as ‘failures’ because these films use artificial background and lighting to express ‘what is invisible’ or ‘what does not exist’. However a lot of films have human being’s emotion, imagination, inner conflict, state of mind, dream or fantasy as its main subject matter. If film makers who are interested in these subject matters are restricted in filming outside world as it is, it would be the same thing as to put them in fetters. Camera records whatever it is in front of it. Camera does not make difference between natural reality and artificial reality. Film history is divided into two clearly separated styles, realistic and expressionistic style. Both deserve proper appreciation for their own virtue and beauty rather than disparaged on the basis of one of two positions.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
2. 〈열정〉의 표현주의적 스타일 분석
3. 표현주의 영화에 대한 바쟁의 비판에 대하여
4. 마무리
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-600-001167358