개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A plurality of peoples inhabits the world, and frequently the world is presented as a common space where differences among peoples are manifest. Each people is a group, so differences among peoples are not entirely reducible to differences among individuals. In order to tell the plurality of peoples from the plurality of human individuals, we often rely upon categories for collective identities such as family, kin, race, nation, ethnos, and culture. The most commanding category for collective unity in the modern world is given in language, so that the language is represented as expressing the primordial union of a people. If one human body is somewhat a marker of human ‘individuality,’ the image - or figure, trope, or schema - of a language gives the sense of an individual or indivisible collectivity. Yet, on what ground is it possible to claim that the image of a language is autonomous and self-oriented?
My paper argues that what is primarily given is not an image of a language but the image, figure, trope, or schema of languages; the locale where languages are identified is never contained within a single language. The identification of a language is possible only in an heteronomous encounter of frontier where translation is conducted. Differences among peoples precede the union of a people, just as translation comes before the identification of a language. I call this process of social encounter “bordering,” borrowing the term introduced by Sandro Mezzadra and Brett Neilson.
Then my argument seeks the consequences of the language’s pluralist origin in two directions: the first is a historical analysis of a schematism by which the image of languages was reorganized in modernity. The national language comes into being through this schematism. The second is the question of culture, and of its subordination to the schematism of national languages. Culture is often modeled after the image of a national language.
From these two perspectives, I seek to explore the concept of ‘heterolingual address’ and “bordering.”
My paper argues that what is primarily given is not an image of a language but the image, figure, trope, or schema of languages; the locale where languages are identified is never contained within a single language. The identification of a language is possible only in an heteronomous encounter of frontier where translation is conducted. Differences among peoples precede the union of a people, just as translation comes before the identification of a language. I call this process of social encounter “bordering,” borrowing the term introduced by Sandro Mezzadra and Brett Neilson.
Then my argument seeks the consequences of the language’s pluralist origin in two directions: the first is a historical analysis of a schematism by which the image of languages was reorganized in modernity. The national language comes into being through this schematism. The second is the question of culture, and of its subordination to the schematism of national languages. Culture is often modeled after the image of a national language.
From these two perspectives, I seek to explore the concept of ‘heterolingual address’ and “bordering.”
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Chang, Briankle / 1993 / Ceconstructing Dommunication: Representation, subject, and economies of exchange / Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
2. [단행본] - Fukuzawa, Yukichi / 1973 / An Outline of a Theory of Civilization / Tokyo: Sophia University Press
3. [단행본] - Kant, Immanuel / 1929 / Critique of Pure Reason / New York: St. Martin’s Press
4. [학술대회논문] - Mezzadra, Sandro / 2008 / Border as Method or The Multiplication of Labor / the International Conference “Italian as second language – citizenship, language, and translation.”
5. [단행본] - Mill, John Stuart / 1861 / Utilitarianism: Liberty. Considerations on representative government / London: Dent
2. [단행본] - Fukuzawa, Yukichi / 1973 / An Outline of a Theory of Civilization / Tokyo: Sophia University Press
3. [단행본] - Kant, Immanuel / 1929 / Critique of Pure Reason / New York: St. Martin’s Press
4. [학술대회논문] - Mezzadra, Sandro / 2008 / Border as Method or The Multiplication of Labor / the International Conference “Italian as second language – citizenship, language, and translation.”
5. [단행본] - Mill, John Stuart / 1861 / Utilitarianism: Liberty. Considerations on representative government / London: Dent
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
정동과 이데올로기
이동연
문화과학
2016
.06
중국 근대 번역의 두 가지 방향 : 『신청년(新靑年)』과 린수(林紓)의 소설 번역을 중심으로
김하나
번역학연구
2014
.03
[20세기 신학사상과 무대 뒤의 편집자들 ⑬] 근대 출판사의 정치적 기능(2) - ‘번역’(飜譯)의 정치학
후카이 토모아키
,
홍이표
기독교사상
2013
.09
Industrial Revolution in Europe and ‘the Great Divergence’ on East Asia
Kim
,
Doo-Jin
,
Lee
외 1명
아세아연구
2012
.06
1950년대 남한의 아시아 내셔널리즘론 : 동남아시아를 정위(定位) 하기
김예림
아세아연구
2012
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-001381404