지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.11
- 수록면
- 29 - 45 (17page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A great problem for the modern state is deciding the order of policy priorities. There are conflicts in the choice of priorities due to limited resources, restricted time, and the different policy circumstances between government departments. In particular, policies concerned with cultural properties suffer from serious problems because cultural assets display characteristics of both private and common goods. The conflicts are various because cultural assets and properties both belong to the commons, as they are based on shared values for local society, and the realm of private goods, as they highlight personal viewpoints. These conflicts have induced damage of cultural assets as common property in communities. Accordingly, it is necessary to define accurately the concept and content of the commons. This article compares the National Trust of the United Kingdom with Korea"s National Trust. The ultimate purpose of this research, rather than a simple comparative study of cultural policy which explicates differences, is to suggest how each case can contribute to the process of social agenda-decision making.
목차
I. 서론
II. 이해 당사자 간의 합리적 의사결정과 공유재의 구축
III. 영국의 내셔날 트러스트(National Trust) 운동과 한국의 국민신탁운동
IV. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-350-001323266