메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정철 (숭실대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2011년 겨울호(통권 97호)
발행연도
2011.11
수록면
46 - 79 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Throughout its history, North Korea"s leadership had been trying to preserve its autonomy at any cost. The Juche ideology and the Suryung system promoted autonomy domestically and internationally.
In the aftermath of the Cold War era, Kim Il Sung was confronted with two options: to avoid regional isolation by pursuing the cross-recognition of both Koreas by all the major powers or to create a new balance of power through nuclear armament.
In response to the South Korean government"s Nord Politik policy in 1988, Kim Ii Sung during the early 1990s adopted the former of the two options, a "Sud Politik." Confronted with the sudden and unexpected recognition of South Korea by the Soviet Union in 1990, North Korea made efforts to normalize relations with Japan and the U.S. while enhancing Inter-Korean relations (through the North-South Basic Agreement on Reconciliation, Non-Aggression and Exchanges and Cooperation). However, the Slid Politik failed as a conservative US, Japan, South Korea coalition shifted its North Korea policy from engagement to coercion in the aftermath of the recognition of South Korea by China in August 1992.
In response to this new coercive environment North Korea shifted its Sud Politik to its second option: nuclear armament. In order to accomplish this process the North Korean leadership fully utilized their diplomatic and domestic autonomy. No forces domestic or international would be allowed to block the nuclear armament process. The domestic and international autonomy that were established with the Juche ideology and Suryung system were further re-enforced with a new government-military coalition. The result was a 20 year-long nuclear crisis in which North Korea fell into the trap of autonomy; it successfully preserved its autonomy but at the cost of a collapsed political and economic system.

목차

들어가며: 탈냉전과 북한의 대외정책 결정 요인
1. 80년대 북한의 개혁·개방 인식과 사회주의 ‘완전승리‘ 테제
2. 기본합의서 정국: 자율성 과잉의 대외·대남정책과 남방정책의 좌절
결론: 자율성 함정

참고문헌

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-905-001129425