지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Robert Elliot Fox and Bruce Allen Dick have contended that Reed’s seventh novel Reckless Eyeballing has weakened his literary authority achieved as a postmodernism writer for his later anti-feminist writing preferences found in his seventh novel. However, this essay attempts to discuss that their arguments with the novel somewhat overlook the diverse possibilities to understand the text within thematic multiplicity for their massive attention to the stereotyped image of Reed as an anti-feminist and misogynist.
Reed reveals that Reckless Eyeballing is not the critical site of anti-feminist but the text of how to recover the African American historical event dishonestly manipulated by the mainstream and even put in the crisis of amnesiac state. Reed’s novel indeed reconsiders historical events such as the murder of a young African American Emmett Till and a Jewish American Leo Frank in a way to criticize the distortion and perversion of the ethnic American histories by the mainstream such as Becky French, satirical version of Susan Brownmiller and even their amnesiac state of minority histories.
Creating a problematic African American character Ian Ball, Reed also presents the core issue of African American intellectual community whose all the problems with historical representations are closely related to the assimilation into the mainstream with success as a prominent writer. However, by suggesting Ball who has never been conversant with his own ethnic heritage and history, Reed stresses that it is essential for black intellectuals like Ball to (re)inscribe African American history in their mind with fully understanding it. In doing so, Reed believes that African American can be a proper subject to establish the truth of his or her own history as a way to resist the distortion and perversion of the history caused by the mainstream.
Reed reveals that Reckless Eyeballing is not the critical site of anti-feminist but the text of how to recover the African American historical event dishonestly manipulated by the mainstream and even put in the crisis of amnesiac state. Reed’s novel indeed reconsiders historical events such as the murder of a young African American Emmett Till and a Jewish American Leo Frank in a way to criticize the distortion and perversion of the ethnic American histories by the mainstream such as Becky French, satirical version of Susan Brownmiller and even their amnesiac state of minority histories.
Creating a problematic African American character Ian Ball, Reed also presents the core issue of African American intellectual community whose all the problems with historical representations are closely related to the assimilation into the mainstream with success as a prominent writer. However, by suggesting Ball who has never been conversant with his own ethnic heritage and history, Reed stresses that it is essential for black intellectuals like Ball to (re)inscribe African American history in their mind with fully understanding it. In doing so, Reed believes that African American can be a proper subject to establish the truth of his or her own history as a way to resist the distortion and perversion of the history caused by the mainstream.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 리드의 급진적 페미니즘에 대한 비판
Ⅲ. 흑인지식인과 역사왜곡의 문제
Ⅳ. 역사왜곡에 대한 문제점 인식의 필요성
Ⅴ. 결론: 왜곡된 주체의 한계를 넘어
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-001095139