지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article deals with the relationship between Kim In-suh’s perceptions of his time and his Koreanized Christianity. Previous studies have highly appreciated his Koreanized Christianity itself, but further and deeper researches on various characters and limits of it have not been proceeded so far. Also this article tries to find out what was Korea Church like at that time under historical circumstances.
The fact that there were similarities in the way Kim In-suh and Lee Yong-do perceived the issues on Korea Church was emphasized in this article. Once they were colleagues and it made them have similar points of view. Eventually, however, Kim chose a different path from Lee’s because he had contrasting opinion on how to overcome the existing crisis in Korea Church. He believed the problem can be solved not by revolution but by revival.
Unlike other Presbyterians, Kim argued Korea Church should be self-supported and pursue Koreanized Christianity. This did not mean the exclusion or severance from Mission boards and missionaries. He maintained positive relationship with them. Kim gave high appraisal of Gil Sun-joo’s Korea Theology because he thought Gil’s Malseron(eschatology) acutely expressed oriental and biblical truth.
This article summarized several characteristics of Kim’s Koreanized Christianity. Despite clear limitations, his was the most possible and viable indigenization theory at that time. In other words, by arguing the indigenization in church, he could minimize the existing conflicts with Korean church.
The fact that there were similarities in the way Kim In-suh and Lee Yong-do perceived the issues on Korea Church was emphasized in this article. Once they were colleagues and it made them have similar points of view. Eventually, however, Kim chose a different path from Lee’s because he had contrasting opinion on how to overcome the existing crisis in Korea Church. He believed the problem can be solved not by revolution but by revival.
Unlike other Presbyterians, Kim argued Korea Church should be self-supported and pursue Koreanized Christianity. This did not mean the exclusion or severance from Mission boards and missionaries. He maintained positive relationship with them. Kim gave high appraisal of Gil Sun-joo’s Korea Theology because he thought Gil’s Malseron(eschatology) acutely expressed oriental and biblical truth.
This article summarized several characteristics of Kim’s Koreanized Christianity. Despite clear limitations, his was the most possible and viable indigenization theory at that time. In other words, by arguing the indigenization in church, he could minimize the existing conflicts with Korean church.
목차
Ⅰ. 여는 말
Ⅱ. 조선교회 인식
Ⅲ. 서구교회와 선교사 인식
Ⅳ. 일본 인식
Ⅴ. 조선신학과 동양적 경건
Ⅵ. 조선신학의 한 모델, 길선주
Ⅶ. 김인서의 조선적 기독교의 특징
Ⅷ. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김인서 / 1976 / 金麟瑞著作全集. 전6권 / 서울: 신망애사
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 無敎會者의 批評에 答함 / 신학지남 54 : 33 ~ 38
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 무교회주의자 內村鑑三씨에 대하야 / 신학지남 52 : 37 ~ 42
8. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 總會及敎會에 三提願 / 신학지남 52 : 63 ~ 64
9. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 故富斗壹先生을 哀悼함 / 신학지남 51 : 1 ~
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 無敎會者의 批評에 答함 / 신학지남 54 : 33 ~ 38
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 무교회주의자 內村鑑三씨에 대하야 / 신학지남 52 : 37 ~ 42
8. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 總會及敎會에 三提願 / 신학지남 52 : 63 ~ 64
9. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인서 / 1930 / 故富斗壹先生을 哀悼함 / 신학지남 51 : 1 ~
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1990년대 한국화 읽기를 위한 제언 : 박생광 이후 채색화의 부흥과 영향
이민수
미술사논단
2018
.06
동남아시아의 예술선언문 : 1970년대 ‘새로움’과 ‘현실’, 그리고 ‘구체성’ 사이에서의 담론 투쟁
셩위진
,
오혜진
미술사논단
2018
.06
적대적 공생 : 1950~1960년대 대만 현대미술의 ‘전통’ 재구축
차이상정
,
문정희
미술사논단
2018
.06
화가의 탄생 : 1930년대 일본의 김환기
우시로쇼지 마사히로
,
김혜신
미술사논단
2018
.06
18세기 작센 군주들의 예술 정책과 드레스덴 국립박물관의 기원
이화진
미술사논단
2018
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-230-000954439