메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
하성균 (한양대학교) 태성호 (한양대학교) 신성우 (한양대학교) 김경래 (아주대학교) 이종선 (한국 라파즈석고) 한상현 (한국 라파즈석고) 이진원 (한국 라파즈석고)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계 大韓建築學會論文集 構造系 第27卷 第10號
발행연도
2011.10
수록면
145 - 152 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently driven by the ease of remodeling and increase of lifespan and performances required of apartment houses, demands for plaster board drywall with outstanding flexibility are growing, and the importance of their assessment of environmental load is rising.
In this study, CO<sub>2</sub> generated during the life cycle of a building(LCCO<sub>2</sub>) and its economic efficiency were evaluated for the assessment of the environmental load and cost of buildings that used plaster board drywall. Typical concrete bearing wall structure for apartment building was set as case 1, and comparison subjects were developed as case 2, case 3 and case 4 based on the ratio of plaster board drywall on top of case 1. Structural safety of each building to be assessed and the legal incentives by the use of variable type wall were considered. In addition, both for life cycle CO<sub>2</sub> emission and economic efficiency, life cycle assessments were conducted by stages including construction stage, operation/maintenance stage and demolition/waste stage. A set of data including construction material quantity, amount of energy usage, repair rate and repair period etc which are required in each stage of assessment were utilized for both CO<sub>2</sub> assessment and economic efficiency.
As a result, in case of flat-type, the life cycle CO<sub>2</sub> reduction rates of cases 2, 3 and 4 compare to case1 were 1.0%, 4.5% and 5.4% respectively, and in the assessment of cost, the reduction rates compare to case1 were -0.01%, 5.8% and 6.0% respectively.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 기존 문헌고찰
3. 평가대상 공동주택 선정
4. 석고보드 건식벽체를 적용한 건축물 전과정 CO2 평가
5. 석고보드 건식벽체를 적용한 건축물 전과정 경제성 평가
참고문헌

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-540-000911575