메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
현승수 (한양대)
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제26권 3호
발행연도
2011.9
수록면
253 - 286 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After the experience of ‘failed state’ at the beginning of 1990s, Azeri central authority has been restored and stability has returned. But the regime has become increasingly authoritarian since then. So far, the results in terms of regime transition and liberalization have not met the expectations of the international community. This paper argues that this situation has much to do with the prioritization of a power-building strategy over state-building since Heydar Aliyev and his patronage networks took power. It analyses how father and son Aliyevs have resorted to formal institutions and to informal structures in order to impose and reproduce their domination, and applies a typology to Azeri state according to four forms of legitimacy: charismatic, bureaucratic, patrimonial and democratic. Based on this analysis and the theoretical model, it becomes possible to categorize the post-Soviet Azerbaijan. The political legitimacy formula has significantly changed since 1993. Democratic and bureaucratic forms of legitimacy play a lesser role today, whereas charismatic and neo-patrimonialist forms of legitimacy became the core mechanisms of the political system. As a result, Azerbaijan can be mainly characterized as a mix of collusive and reationary state, with some populism. Growing authoritarianism, neo-patrimonialism, collusion, and institutional weakness influence each other and thus brings to question the future of political stability in Azerbaijan.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 이론적 검토: 국가 건설과 정당성
Ⅲ. 아제르바이잔 국가 건설 과정의 특징
Ⅳ. 아제르바이잔 국가 정당성 분석
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-309-000845177