메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박우수 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.47 No.3
발행연도
2011.9
수록면
629 - 649 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Debate in Love's Labour Lost Abstract Woo-Soo Park The debate between spring and winter in Shakespeare's early ‘lyrical’ comedy, Love's Labour Lost, is a unifying theme and structure; it is not attached for the musicians at the time of rehearsal of the play, written on a separate paper. The dialogue or debate of spring and winter reflects the traditional medieval literary form representing two irreconcilable opposing values or attitudes of life, as shown in such works as The Owl and the Nightingale(c.1250) and The Debate and Stryfe Between Somer and Wynter(c.1530). The Shakespearean debate, which was originally planned as the end of the pageant play, “the Nine Worthies”, is replaced as an epilogue to the main play. Through this technical replacement in the play of the dialogue between spring and winter, Shakespeare critiques the artificiality of the traditional debate form as a kind of aristocratic and intellectual game or war of wits. As a language game, the debate form seems to Shakespeare's eyes unnatural in separating the intermingled yarns of life; rather his vision of life is comprehensive and dialectical. The vigorous and energetic sexuality of the spring time is also found in the ice-cold winter when the owl hoots to the greasy Joan to make it. As in the cuckoo's song of love is overheard the undertone of infidelity and betrayal, the two opposite seasons of spring and winter are mutable in the cyclic space of life. By his critical and ironical appropriation of the inherited debate form, Shakespeare is satirical of the humorous young aristocrats in their speech and behavior. If the anti-comic ending of the play is in itself the Shakespearean experiment on the comic genre of courtship and marriage, the debate form in the play works as his ‘living art.’ However, this re-appropriation of the literary form in Shakespeare does not mean the final triumph of Apollonian song over the Mercurian eloquence and letters. The songs are written. The Shakespearean authority in the theatre as a playwright lies somewhere between the borderland of speech as a breath and textual letters. The theatrical representation is both a voice and a letter at once.

목차

인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-000845077