지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Claude Bernard, a French physiologist in the nineteenth century, strove to establish experimental physiology as a medical branch and scientific field. In 1854, he started his lecture series on general physiology at the Paris Faculty of Sciences, which was continued at the National Museum of Natural History since 1869 when Bernard’s chair was transferred from the Faculty to the Museum. At the Museum, Bernard titled his lecture series the “Phenomena of Life Common to Animals and Plants,” which revealed the main characteristic of his general physiology. At that time, physiology was generally considered a medical science which dealt only with the human body. Bernard, on the other hand, came to have the idea that physiology could study the functions of plant, animal, and human bodies in the same manner.
Bernard’s lectures on general physiology had two distinct phases. At Sorbonne, general physiology was a rather speculative theoretical system. It was mainly because of the fact that he did not have a laboratory at the Faculty of Sciences. There, the lecture dealt only with animal functions, and he had no concern for plant physiology at all. After he moved to the Museum, significant changes occurred. In the new laboratory, general physiology was transformed into a truly experimental science, which dealt with both animals and plants. Protoplasm, a physiological basic unit, replaced tissue, which was basically an anatomical unit that fell short of explaining physiological phenomena.
The Museum of Natural History played an important role in this transformation. At the museum, zoologists, botanists, and physiologists worked together, and the peculiar natural history tradition of the institution enabled scientists to study animals and plants at the same time. Although there existed some conflicts between experimentalists and naturalists, Bernard could wisely figure out the problem by asserting that the role of a physiologist was to disclose, by experimentation, the fundamental principles that lay behind the superficial facts of life that were already discovered by natural historians. At the Museum, Bernard could break down the distinction between the animal and plant kingdoms in the domain of experimental physiology, and it can perhaps be considered a step toward the formation of the general science of biology.
Bernard’s lectures on general physiology had two distinct phases. At Sorbonne, general physiology was a rather speculative theoretical system. It was mainly because of the fact that he did not have a laboratory at the Faculty of Sciences. There, the lecture dealt only with animal functions, and he had no concern for plant physiology at all. After he moved to the Museum, significant changes occurred. In the new laboratory, general physiology was transformed into a truly experimental science, which dealt with both animals and plants. Protoplasm, a physiological basic unit, replaced tissue, which was basically an anatomical unit that fell short of explaining physiological phenomena.
The Museum of Natural History played an important role in this transformation. At the museum, zoologists, botanists, and physiologists worked together, and the peculiar natural history tradition of the institution enabled scientists to study animals and plants at the same time. Although there existed some conflicts between experimentalists and naturalists, Bernard could wisely figure out the problem by asserting that the role of a physiologist was to disclose, by experimentation, the fundamental principles that lay behind the superficial facts of life that were already discovered by natural historians. At the Museum, Bernard could break down the distinction between the animal and plant kingdoms in the domain of experimental physiology, and it can perhaps be considered a step toward the formation of the general science of biology.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 일반생리학 체계의 형성과 변화
3. 일반생리학 연구의 배경: 생물학회와 국립 자연사 박물관
4. 맺음말
참고 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
자비에르 비샤의 의학사상 : 프랑스 생기론의 역사적 맥락에서
의사학
2012 .04
-
클로드 베르나르의 실험 의학 : 19세기 유럽 문학에 나타난 자연주의와 근대성의 기원 연구
의사학
2013 .04
-
19세기 서유럽 생리학의 전문과학화 과정
의사학
1992 .12
-
『파도』: 버나드의 예술가적 비전의 성취
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
홍석후의 『신편생리교과서』(1906) 번역과 그 의미
의사학
2012 .12
-
〈1978학년도 석사 학위 논문 : 要約〉中世後期 基督教 神秘神學에 關한 硏究 : Bernard와 Eckhart를 中心으로
신학과세계
1979 .10
-
Bernard Mandeville의 社會思想
서강인문논총
1995 .01
-
Bernard Shaw 극에 나타난 구원을 위한 리얼리티 추구
현대영미드라마
1995 .08
-
고대 그리스 생리학에 나타난 열(thermos)과 열병(puretos)의 관계
의사학
2009 .12
-
‘Jewish Movement’에서의 Bernard Malamud의 위상과 특질
새한영어영문학
1991 .12
-
Little Animal
Korea Journal
1963 .02
-
버나드 쇼의 여성관
코기토
1996 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-510-000771811