지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Wang Huizu(汪輝祖) was a eminent private adviser(幕友) in Qing dynasty and, as a prolific writer, left various documents including ‘guidebooks for governance(官箴書)’ based on his rich experience. In those guidebooks for governance, he emphasized the role of private adviser to monitor and cure the ills of local administration. As a matter of fact, the importance of private adviser was becoming bigger and bigger throughout Qing dynasty because of the local clerks(胥吏)’s mischief. The local administration in Qing dynasty worked by local officers(地方官) on the one hand, and by various irregular positions of local clerks on the other hand. A response of Qing dynasty to the ills of local adminstration, mainly stemming from the local clerks’ mischieves, was to increase informal private advisers. Those private advisers and local clerks were turned into formal official assistants in late Qing dynasty.
In Guidebooks for Governance, Wang Huizu often emphasized the importance of acquaintance of law by local officers and private advisers. He did not insisted on the priority of law, however, over the aspects and logics of actual cases. In other words, he did not ignore the importance of counting on the aspects of actual, individual cases, denying the absolute priority of laws. This was because of the variety of customs in many parts of the empire which was not confined to daily life’s custome but also included many different rules of trade, tax collection, buying and selling of lands, and so forth. The variety of those customs made it difficult to homogenizing the empire’s local rules under the one unified principle of laws, and Wang insisted on the application of state law to be in harmony with various local customs.
In Guidebooks for Governance, Wang Huizu often emphasized the importance of acquaintance of law by local officers and private advisers. He did not insisted on the priority of law, however, over the aspects and logics of actual cases. In other words, he did not ignore the importance of counting on the aspects of actual, individual cases, denying the absolute priority of laws. This was because of the variety of customs in many parts of the empire which was not confined to daily life’s custome but also included many different rules of trade, tax collection, buying and selling of lands, and so forth. The variety of those customs made it difficult to homogenizing the empire’s local rules under the one unified principle of laws, and Wang insisted on the application of state law to be in harmony with various local customs.
목차
序論
1) 州縣官衙 내에서의 幕友의 위치
2) 州縣官衙의 構造와 業務
3) 裁判과 行政의 運用原理
結論
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-000465321