지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although the concept of hybrid or hybridity has become key in cultural studies, postcolonial studies, and other fields, it has brought about a lot of debate on its definition. Some critics praise its ability to critically intervene in the essentialist notions of identity, race, and culture, and to subvert binary categories such as superiority/inferiority, center/periphery, barbarism/civilization, and the higher/the lower, which are produced by dominant Western forces. Conversely, other critics warn that the notion of hybrid itself is reified or essentialized when it is employed without considering the social and political realities. They also question the notion of hybrid as used as a new means of cultural domination, manipulation, and commodification by transnational capital and dominant cultural forces, when the notion itself is separated from its own social and historical realities.
This paper examines these positive and negative arguments, and then it reviews Lesile Marmon Silko’s Ceremony to reveal the critical possibility of the hybrid or hybridity. Section Ⅱ investigates how Silko criticizes and undermines Western essentialist binarism through characters and stories in the novel. In Section Ⅲ, this paper explains that Silko seeks the critical possibility of the hybrid, as opposed to being the way of commodification, while depicting marginalized subjects’ suffering and frustrations that are a result of the economic inequalities and differences in the text. Section Ⅳ examines what Tayo and Old Betonie, the hybrid subjects, pursue to overcome violence, hatred, suppression and discrimination, and then discusses a new recognition of the hybrid as transition and creation, not as boundary and exclusion.
This paper examines these positive and negative arguments, and then it reviews Lesile Marmon Silko’s Ceremony to reveal the critical possibility of the hybrid or hybridity. Section Ⅱ investigates how Silko criticizes and undermines Western essentialist binarism through characters and stories in the novel. In Section Ⅲ, this paper explains that Silko seeks the critical possibility of the hybrid, as opposed to being the way of commodification, while depicting marginalized subjects’ suffering and frustrations that are a result of the economic inequalities and differences in the text. Section Ⅳ examines what Tayo and Old Betonie, the hybrid subjects, pursue to overcome violence, hatred, suppression and discrimination, and then discusses a new recognition of the hybrid as transition and creation, not as boundary and exclusion.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 본질주의적 경계의 전복과 비판적 혼종
Ⅲ. 혼종의 추상화와 상품화 비판
Ⅳ. 변화와 창조적 생성을 통한 혼종의 새로운 인식
Ⅳ. 나가며
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 프레드릭 E. / 2000 / 미국사에 던지는 질문-인디언, 황야, 프런티어, 그리고 국가의 영혼 / 영림카디널
2. [단행본] - Ashcroft, Bill / 2000 / Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts / Routledge
3. [단행본] - Brah, Avtar / 2000 / Hybridity and I ts Discontents: Politics, Science, Culture / Routledge
4. [단행본] - Cashmore, Ellis / 2004 / Encyclopedia of Race and Ethic Studies / Routledge
5. [단행본] - Dirlik, Arif / 1997 / The Postcolnial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism / Westview
2. [단행본] - Ashcroft, Bill / 2000 / Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts / Routledge
3. [단행본] - Brah, Avtar / 2000 / Hybridity and I ts Discontents: Politics, Science, Culture / Routledge
4. [단행본] - Cashmore, Ellis / 2004 / Encyclopedia of Race and Ethic Studies / Routledge
5. [단행본] - Dirlik, Arif / 1997 / The Postcolnial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism / Westview
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-000614205