This study aims to present the optimal model of consistent motion and pros & cons through Kinetic analysis and provide basic data for coaching motion about difference of flick shooting motions by shooting sector based on three female elite professional hockey shooters, and the conclusion of the results is as follows. The shooting to the left direction shows a fast turnaround time in PI but the shooting to the right direction shows a fast turnaround time in P2. LB shows the shortest turnaround time in P3 and the similar turnaround time were shown in all direction in P4. The before & after speed of the Center of Mass was appeared that the movement to the goalposts direction is fast when shooting to the left direction, and the heel-toe speed was appeared that fast movement of the Center of Mass forward to the left direction in E3, but LB and RT showed the negative(-) speed, LT and RB showed the positive(+) speed in the impact phase. LT decreased speed sharply in E5. The club head and ball speed of RB was fastest. About the vertical ground reaction force, the shooting to the left direction in the E3phase showed much weight shift. In order to increase club head speed, the weight should be left to the right side for impact, and the weight shift to the left side should be performed in the follow through phase with accelerating the club head. The hip joint(right) angle of LT and RT showed small angle in E1 and E2, and the hip joint(right) angle of LB showed more stretched state in E3 than shooting motion to other direction. After that, it showed the hip joint(right) couldn’t be stretched enough for impact again. RB showed that right foot was pushed fast based on the left foot as axis.