지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The United Kingdom has imposed a duty of suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks faced by employees at work upon employers and the self-employed through the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999(SI 1999/3242).
The process of risk assessment is considered to be the cornerstone of good health and safety management. Failure to comply with the duty to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment is one of the most commonly prosecuted health and safety offences and gives rise to civil liability in the majority cases in the United Kingdom.
This article deals with legal foundations, enforcement powers and enforcement methods of the British risk assessment. The legal foundations are Council Directive 89/391/EEC, Regulations 1999 mentioned above, and Approved Code of Practice concerned. The important enforcement powers are Health and Safety Executive, Local Authorities, and Inspectors. The main enforcement methods of risk assessment are improvement notice/prohibition notice and criminal penalties.
The features of the British system could be summarized like followings: ① self-imposed control on the employers and emphasis of strict liability on them, ② comprehensive and strong competence of inspectors.
To apply the British system relevantly to Korean industry, the followings have to be considered seriously: ① decide the regal status of risk assessment appropriately, ② restructure Korean legal frame of health and safety laws, ③ strengthen the powers of inspectors.
The process of risk assessment is considered to be the cornerstone of good health and safety management. Failure to comply with the duty to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment is one of the most commonly prosecuted health and safety offences and gives rise to civil liability in the majority cases in the United Kingdom.
This article deals with legal foundations, enforcement powers and enforcement methods of the British risk assessment. The legal foundations are Council Directive 89/391/EEC, Regulations 1999 mentioned above, and Approved Code of Practice concerned. The important enforcement powers are Health and Safety Executive, Local Authorities, and Inspectors. The main enforcement methods of risk assessment are improvement notice/prohibition notice and criminal penalties.
The features of the British system could be summarized like followings: ① self-imposed control on the employers and emphasis of strict liability on them, ② comprehensive and strong competence of inspectors.
To apply the British system relevantly to Korean industry, the followings have to be considered seriously: ① decide the regal status of risk assessment appropriately, ② restructure Korean legal frame of health and safety laws, ③ strengthen the powers of inspectors.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 위험성평가의 의의
Ⅲ. 위험성평가의 법적 근거
Ⅳ. 위험성평가의 내용
Ⅴ. 위험성평가의 집행수단
Ⅵ. 우리나라 위험성평가의 현황과 영국의 시사점
Ⅶ. 나가며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
1. [보고서] - 고용노동부 / 2010 / 2009년도 산업재해분석
2. [보고서] - 고용노동부 / 2010 / 유해․위험요인 자기관리 시범사업(위험성평가)
3. [단행본] - David Walters / 2002 / Regulating Health and Safety Management in the European Union / P.I.E.-Peter Lang
4. [보고서] - HSE / 2002 / Enforcement Management Model, in (Operational Version 3.0
5. [보고서] - HSE / 2006 / Essentials of Health and Safety at Work
2. [보고서] - 고용노동부 / 2010 / 유해․위험요인 자기관리 시범사업(위험성평가)
3. [단행본] - David Walters / 2002 / Regulating Health and Safety Management in the European Union / P.I.E.-Peter Lang
4. [보고서] - HSE / 2002 / Enforcement Management Model, in (Operational Version 3.0
5. [보고서] - HSE / 2006 / Essentials of Health and Safety at Work
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-336-000594089