지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ha, Geun-chan's novels have dramatically changed since 1970s, due to the Agreement between Korea and Japan in 1965. After this historical event he came to become suspicious about his ethnic identity, which he used to regard stable. At that time Ha, Geun-chan tried to reconstruct his ethnic and personal identity by presenting his youth memories of colonial school in various ways.
In his novel, colonial school is shown as the place where the colonial distinction is structured. In this place the colonial rulers are distinguished in two types. While the ‘principal’ is described as a barbarous and inhuman character, the ‘female teacher’ as a bucolic and an favored one. In this place of memory, colonial boys are the main character and they soothe the colonial gap among them. The representation through ‘stereotype’ and ‘play’ was the device to release the pain of reminding such memories.
On the other side, the novel of Ha, Geun-chan represent the memory of liberation as ironic experiences. This means that the memory of liberation can be interpreted in various ways by the nation or people that have been liberated from the colonial condition. In this regard, in his novels he tends to represent the same memory in different ways. Then, after, he tries to solve the unstable identities of a nation and people after colonialism. To do this he put his ‘father’ in front in the novel as one of the inspiring factors against the colonial system.
In his novel, colonial school is shown as the place where the colonial distinction is structured. In this place the colonial rulers are distinguished in two types. While the ‘principal’ is described as a barbarous and inhuman character, the ‘female teacher’ as a bucolic and an favored one. In this place of memory, colonial boys are the main character and they soothe the colonial gap among them. The representation through ‘stereotype’ and ‘play’ was the device to release the pain of reminding such memories.
On the other side, the novel of Ha, Geun-chan represent the memory of liberation as ironic experiences. This means that the memory of liberation can be interpreted in various ways by the nation or people that have been liberated from the colonial condition. In this regard, in his novels he tends to represent the same memory in different ways. Then, after, he tries to solve the unstable identities of a nation and people after colonialism. To do this he put his ‘father’ in front in the novel as one of the inspiring factors against the colonial system.
목차
Abstract
1. 수난 서사와 민족 정체성
2. 식민지적 차이의 재현 : 정형화와 ‘놀이’
3. 아버지의 복원과 민족 정체성의 재구성
4. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
분단 상처와 치유의 상상력 : 하근찬 소설을 중심으로
오창은
우리말글
2011
.08
하근찬 소설의 모티프 연구
장현
한국현대문학연구
2008
.12
한국전쟁기 토속적 삶의 파괴를 형상화하는 두 경향 : 오영수·하근찬의 한국전쟁 관련 단편을 중심으로
김준현
비평문학
2011
.09
관전사(貫戰史)의 관점으로 본 한국전쟁 기억의 두 가지 형식 : 선우휘의 「불꽃」과 하근찬의 「수난이대」를 중심으로
한수영
어문학
2011
.09
‘문학적 공간’의 분석을 통한 ‘지리적 공간’의 재구성 : 하근찬의 『수난이대』를 중심으로
김동혁
어문론집
2011
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-710-000591779