지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to the Korean commercial act, the capital regime of corporations are strictly maintained for protecting creditors. However, the problems lies in that such capital regime cannot perform its role of protecting creditors due to the notification system and various receivables collateral system in modern society. Besides, capital and reserve is just a numeric amount in calculation which is not an actual accumulation of company property equivalent to it, and since it is becoming a standard of item for deduction of allotted financial sources, it is showing its limitation in playing the role of an allotment regulation. In the midst of this, the real state of affairs is that countries like the US, Japan, EU, and Germany has eased or is showing the movement to ease the currently strict capital regime of corporations of the corporation law in the aspect of rationalization of the system, flexibility of corporate finance management, and efficient management rather than protecting creditors. In recent times, even Korean academic circles have constantly pointed out problems regarding this matter, and there were active discussions regarding this as a subcommittee for amendment of commercial act was organized in 2005 under the supervision of the government(Ministry of Justice). Finally, it came to a point where a partial amendment bill for the commercial act was sent up to the legislation & judiciary committee of the National Assembly on October 22, 2008(bill no. 1801566). This bill is currently presented to the 1st subcommittee of the 2nd bill review of the committee after going through explanation of the proposal and reporting of reviews. Although this bill significantly eases the capital regime of corporations in the aspect of flexibility of corporate financial management and efficient management, when seeing that the capital regime still exists for the protection of creditors, I think there is a need for a separate device for protecting creditors following the easing of the capital regime. Even in Japan, although they have significantly eased the capital regime on their company law, they are complementing their capital regime as they continue to verify the effects and problems due to the easing. Therefore, this point is worth referring to.
In the main text, I have broadly divided up the capital regime of corporations of the commercial act into capital & reserve system, stock system, and distribution system, and discussed ways to improve them, and presented assignments to be reviewed.
In the main text, I have broadly divided up the capital regime of corporations of the commercial act into capital & reserve system, stock system, and distribution system, and discussed ways to improve them, and presented assignments to be reviewed.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 資本制度의 槪觀
Ⅲ. 主要國의 資本制度
Ⅳ. 資本制度의 問題點 및 改善方案
Ⅴ. 맺음말
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (52)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강희갑 / 2001 / 주요 서구국가의 회사법 개정의 최근 동향 / 비교사법 8 (1)
2. [단행본] - 권기범 / 2001 / 현대회사법론 : 898 ~
3. [단행본] - 권재열 / 2002 / 미국회사법의 최신 개정 동향 - 모범사업회사법과 델라웨어주 일반회사법을 중심으로 / 법조
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권종호 / 2006 / 2006년 회사법개정시안의 주요내용 ― 자금조달관련사항을 중심으로 ― / 상사법연구 25 (2) : 303 ~ 338
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김광윤 / 2006 / 최근 상법상 회계규정의 개정시안에 대한 비판적 고찰 / 회계저널 15 (4) : 23 ~ 41
2. [단행본] - 권기범 / 2001 / 현대회사법론 : 898 ~
3. [단행본] - 권재열 / 2002 / 미국회사법의 최신 개정 동향 - 모범사업회사법과 델라웨어주 일반회사법을 중심으로 / 법조
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권종호 / 2006 / 2006년 회사법개정시안의 주요내용 ― 자금조달관련사항을 중심으로 ― / 상사법연구 25 (2) : 303 ~ 338
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김광윤 / 2006 / 최근 상법상 회계규정의 개정시안에 대한 비판적 고찰 / 회계저널 15 (4) : 23 ~ 41
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-366-004451094