메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이환철 (선진엔지니어링) 현창택 (서울시립대학교) 손명진 (서울시립대학교) 지성민 (서울시립대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 구조계 大韓建築學會論文集 構造系 第27卷 第4號
발행연도
2011.4
수록면
113 - 120 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After the VE analysis method has been applied to domestic construction industry, the design VE proposal was carried out to design related to various facilities. In this VE activities, The two key elements to elicit these VE proposals are 'Function' and 'Cost' which are needed in assessing grade of VE's value. However, when it is hard to calculate the money that is connected to existing or improved one, not only owner can't measure the proposals of the VE's value due to it is not available to calculate the quantitative value that is related to the 'Cost' but also it could be an impedimental cause when users make a decision.
Therefore, in this study sought a plan what could take out the quantitative figures that is related to the 'Cost' and suggested the way to calculate the 'Cost'. Before developing a model of evaluation value, I has understood the type of suggestion of VE which are difficult to estimate the cost of the first construction and improved 3 scenarios using with the techniques of analyzed classes and scenario planning. And adapted rating step process with the improved scenarios then developed the model of evaluating value. Furthermore, I applied example projects to examine the developed the model of evaluating value's applicability. Plus, I investigated a possibility of applicability on the field through VE experts' interview survey.
The model of evaluating value using the developed scenarios in this study gave a direction to calculate the cost that is difficult to calculate. Also I expect that it would be available to perform systematic and rational decision making.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 예비적 고찰
3. 설계VE 가치평가단계의 개선방안
4. 가치평가 모델 개발
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-540-004500276