메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김도윤 (인하대학교) 김원현 (대덕대학)
저널정보
한국생활환경학회 한국생활환경학회지 한국생활환경학회지 제17권 제4호
발행연도
2010.8
수록면
409 - 418 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was to research the actual condition of middle school students' cycling commuting and the comparison of the physique and fitness according to the commuting way. For this purpose, 316 second grade male students participated in this research. For the statistic results, we used one way ANOYA. The results were followed as below: First, among the 316 boys 144 boys (45.6%) commuted by walking, while 64 boys (20.3%) by cycling to school. Second, 116 students (46%) among the 252 students that didn't commute by cycling to school hoped to commute to school by cycling in future. Third, on the opinion for the improvement of cycling commuting, 56 students who was commuting by cycling wished for the anti-theft counterplan and the improvement of cycle shed, while bike-lane were hoped to be improved by the other 8 students. Forth, 36 boys among the students who didn't commute by bicycle but hoped in future wished the improvement of bicycle shed and 28 students hoped for the betterment of bicycle lane. Fifth, there was no significant difference in weight, height and BMI according to the commuting way (p>.05), but the tendency was showed that students' physique by walking might be better than others. Sixth, there were the tendencies that the records of 50 m rush and long distance run by cycling commuting might be better but the results were not significant (p>.05). With these results, there might be no positive effect on the physique and fitness by cycling commuting. Even though there was no significant effect, we could expect the development of endurance and muscular power on lower body by cycling commuting within long time participation.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연구 방법
3. 연구 결과
4. 논의
5. 결론
인용문헌

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-590-003651007