지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2007.6
- 수록면
- 305 - 327 (23page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Individual sword-fights are generally considered as a conventional way to dramatize battles. Many playwrights have used sword-fight scenes for many dramatic reasons, sometimes to attract audience as a visual effect. Single combats, as synecdoche, made necessary by limited theater space and personnel, provide a satisfying symbolic climax when the leader of one army personally conquers the leader of another. Shakespeare is not exceptional in this regard. He uses single combat scenes as a useful dramatic device in several plays, with results ranging from comic misunderstandings in Twelfth Night to tragic denouements in Hamlet. To have Richmond overcome Richard III and Edgar overcome Edmond, show two good examples of single combat scenes.
However, let's consider two special scenes in Antony and Cleopatra and 1 Henry Ⅳ. In Antony and Cleopatra, the disgraced Antony, defeated at Actium but still commander of a considerable army, tries to revive his waning fortunes by daring Octavius Caesar to fight him "sword against sword'(3.13.27-28). Prince Hal, in 1 Henry Ⅳ, also attempts to prevent general bloodshed at Shrewsbury by appealing to Hotspur to "try fortune with him in a single fight"(5.1.100). What these scenes have in common is the subject of this study.
Such challenge to one-to-one combat in Antony and Cleopatra and 1 Henry Ⅳ serves a special dramatic purpose on stage. It puts into sharp focus the clashes of value and character in each of the two plays. Antony's unrealistic, daring, but admirable challenge is sharply contrasted to Octavius Caesar's cool, efficient, but unattractive practicality. Shakespeare handles the challenge scene effectively to express simultaneously the greatness and weakness of Antony. The suggestion of a single combat in a context of mass warfare in 1 Henry Ⅳ, also shows the contrast between Hotspur, an idealistic, honorable, but selfish knight and Prince Hal who educates himself and builds his image as a hero-king through the whole play. Shakespeare uses single combat in Hal's case to make sure he has good qualities enough to become England's king and has the power to move beyond old value to shape the future.
However, let's consider two special scenes in Antony and Cleopatra and 1 Henry Ⅳ. In Antony and Cleopatra, the disgraced Antony, defeated at Actium but still commander of a considerable army, tries to revive his waning fortunes by daring Octavius Caesar to fight him "sword against sword'(3.13.27-28). Prince Hal, in 1 Henry Ⅳ, also attempts to prevent general bloodshed at Shrewsbury by appealing to Hotspur to "try fortune with him in a single fight"(5.1.100). What these scenes have in common is the subject of this study.
Such challenge to one-to-one combat in Antony and Cleopatra and 1 Henry Ⅳ serves a special dramatic purpose on stage. It puts into sharp focus the clashes of value and character in each of the two plays. Antony's unrealistic, daring, but admirable challenge is sharply contrasted to Octavius Caesar's cool, efficient, but unattractive practicality. Shakespeare handles the challenge scene effectively to express simultaneously the greatness and weakness of Antony. The suggestion of a single combat in a context of mass warfare in 1 Henry Ⅳ, also shows the contrast between Hotspur, an idealistic, honorable, but selfish knight and Prince Hal who educates himself and builds his image as a hero-king through the whole play. Shakespeare uses single combat in Hal's case to make sure he has good qualities enough to become England's king and has the power to move beyond old value to shape the future.
목차
Ⅰ.
Ⅱ. 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』에서의 일대일 결투의 의미
Ⅲ. 『헨리 4세』1부에서 일대일 결투의 의미
인용 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 천병희 / 2006 / 플루타르코스 영웅전: 로마가 만든 영웅들
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cohen, Derek / 2002 / History and the Nation in Richard II and Henry IV." 42 : 293 ~ 316
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Goddard / / The Meaning of Shakespeare. Chicago : 132 ~ 174
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Groves, Beatrice / 2004 / Hal as self-styled redeemer 57 : 234 ~ 259
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Howard, Michael / 2001 / War in European History
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cohen, Derek / 2002 / History and the Nation in Richard II and Henry IV." 42 : 293 ~ 316
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Goddard / / The Meaning of Shakespeare. Chicago : 132 ~ 174
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Groves, Beatrice / 2004 / Hal as self-styled redeemer 57 : 234 ~ 259
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Howard, Michael / 2001 / War in European History
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 욕망과 도덕성의 갈등의 기상도
Shakespeare Review
2002 .06
-
선전선동전의 관점에서 본 『안토니와 클레오파트라』: 알렉산드리아 영토분할령 전후에 유포된 흑색 루머
Shakespeare Review
2019 .09
-
프로이드의 욕망이론에 비춰본 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2003 .03
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에서의 이중 파국
Shakespeare Review
2007 .09
-
Antony and Cleopatra에 나타난 성역할의 전도
Shakespeare Review
1990 .06
-
옥타비우스 시저의 권력에의 의지와 역사인식
Shakespeare Review
2008 .12
-
Falstaff-Antony의 정치풍자 : Antony and Cleopatra의 신역사주의적 해석
Shakespeare Review
1991 .12
-
인간 본성의 상징으로 본 『안토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2013 .09
-
담론과 타자 재현의 양상 : 『앤토니와 클레오파트라』
Shakespeare Review
2004 .06
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』다시 읽기 : Theatre and World
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
-
『안토니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 페미니즘 전략과 그 한계
Shakespeare Review
2006 .12
-
Antony and Cleopatra : 心象과 性格發展
Shakespeare Review
1973 .04
-
셰익스피어 로마극의 재평가 : 『안토니와 클레오파트라』를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2004 .12
-
크롬웰의 공화정을 전후한 극장건축구조 변화에 따른 극적 담론과 공연방식의 차이 : 『안토니와 클레오파트라』와 『사랑을 위하여』 사례연구
새한영어영문학
2006 .02
-
Henry Ⅳ, Part 1과 Part 2에 나타난 Hal의 두 아버지
Shakespeare Review
1997 .06
-
Prince Hal's Inner Consistency in 1, 2 Henry Ⅳ
Shakespeare Review
1987 .08
-
『앤터니와 클레오파트라』에 나타난 인간관계의 초월적 속성
Shakespeare Review
2001 .06
-
여성의 부재와 여성성의 전복성 : Antony and Cleopatra에 나타난 여성의 재현
코기토
1998 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-840-003106840