지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study has two objectives. The first objective is to examine previous studies on Jewish education from a Christian educational perspective in order to highlight the similarities and differences between the two educational systems. The second objective is to provide information for Korean Sunday school teachers and adult congregations on Christian biblical, theological, and educational perspectives of Jewish education.
The article examines the following questions: (1) Can Jewish education be a substitute for Christian education? (2) What aspects of Jewish education can Christian education accept or reject? (3) Are the differences between the two in content or in the educational system? (4) Why should this issue be discussed at this time? (5) Should churches view the Old Testament as Jewish scripture or as part of the Bible for Christianity?
Compared to Jewish education, previous studies note that the current Korean public education does not have a strong focus on nationalism and family education. Like Korean public education, Korean Christian education does not have a strong emphasis on family education. Instead, Korean Christian churches have two separated ministerial systems, i.e., Church education for the children versus worship for the adult congregational ministry.
The strengths of Jewish education are, based on previous studies, categorized into five areas: education for faith growth, home education/family education, children’s education, Jewish public school education, and Jewish education (Torah). Despite the strengths of this educational system, Jewish education cannot ever be Christian education since it does not recognize Jesus as Life and Savior. Without Jesus, it cannot be Christian education even if its system or contents are good for families, the community, or the nation.
This study finds the limitations of Jewish education as (1) the absence of Jesus, i.e., no salvation, (2) no New Testament, only the Old Testament, and (3) traditional teaching methods and the transference of the Jewish heritage. By comparing Korean Christian education with Jewish education, the author suggests that Korean Christian education should adapt its: (1) family oriented education and activities, (2) parental education, (3) faith education/spiritual formation through the worship service, and (4) home education within the relationship to the church.
The article examines the following questions: (1) Can Jewish education be a substitute for Christian education? (2) What aspects of Jewish education can Christian education accept or reject? (3) Are the differences between the two in content or in the educational system? (4) Why should this issue be discussed at this time? (5) Should churches view the Old Testament as Jewish scripture or as part of the Bible for Christianity?
Compared to Jewish education, previous studies note that the current Korean public education does not have a strong focus on nationalism and family education. Like Korean public education, Korean Christian education does not have a strong emphasis on family education. Instead, Korean Christian churches have two separated ministerial systems, i.e., Church education for the children versus worship for the adult congregational ministry.
The strengths of Jewish education are, based on previous studies, categorized into five areas: education for faith growth, home education/family education, children’s education, Jewish public school education, and Jewish education (Torah). Despite the strengths of this educational system, Jewish education cannot ever be Christian education since it does not recognize Jesus as Life and Savior. Without Jesus, it cannot be Christian education even if its system or contents are good for families, the community, or the nation.
This study finds the limitations of Jewish education as (1) the absence of Jesus, i.e., no salvation, (2) no New Testament, only the Old Testament, and (3) traditional teaching methods and the transference of the Jewish heritage. By comparing Korean Christian education with Jewish education, the author suggests that Korean Christian education should adapt its: (1) family oriented education and activities, (2) parental education, (3) faith education/spiritual formation through the worship service, and (4) home education within the relationship to the church.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 선행연구자들의 유대교육 이해
Ⅲ. 유대교육에 대한 비판적 이해: 유대교육이 기독교교육을 대신할 수 없는 이유
Ⅳ. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
토라와 유대인 가정교육
기독교교육정보
2005 .08
-
기독교대학의 교양교육과정 개발을 위한 제언
기독교교육정보
2009 .04
-
신유학의 아동교육(1) : 주자와 왕양명을 중심으로
양명학
2015 .08
-
The History Of Korean Christian Higher Education
동서문화
1974 .07
-
Christian Education for Life and Development
신학논단
2004 .06
-
전통과 변화 - 독일 제2 제정기 유대인 가족과 유대인 여성 -
역사와경계
2005 .12
-
대한예수교장로회(통합)의 기독교교육학의 형성과 발전
기독교교육정보
2011 .12
-
イエス韓国におけるキリスト教教育研究の現況と展望
기독교교육 논총
2008 .01
-
기독교교육에서의 사회봉사의 중요성과 사회봉사교육의 방향
기독교교육정보
2009 .04
-
Exploring Big Data Utilization in Christian Education
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2014 .10
-
공적 파이데이아에 기초한 기독교 세계교육 : 기독교학교를 중심으로
장신논단
2007 .09
-
Christian Character Education for Pre-teachers of Religion
기독교교육 논총
2011 .01
-
Relationship and Christian Education : A Search for “Relational” Faith Education
Theology and The World
2011 .09
-
The One Hope : the Jewish and Christian Eschatology
시대와민중신학
2008 .04
-
기독교대학의 기독교 교양교육에 대한 사례 연구
기독교교육정보
2006 .12
-
Christian Education for the Jewish Christian during the 13th-14th centuries Based on Biblical Pauerum
기독교교육 논총
2015 .01
-
Christian Education for Freedom
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2001 .06
-
THE USE OF MUSIC IN CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
신학논단
1959 .09
-
엠마오 사건에 나타난 기독교교육의 구조
한국기독교신학논총
2002 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-235-002839025