지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Two decades of industry consolidation have resulted in a few massive financial holding companies controlling a disproportionate amount of the industry in U.S. Representing the most comprehensive reform of the financial services industry in nearly seventy years. President Clinton signed the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 into law on November 12, 1999.
The Act included provisions designed to facilitate affiliation among banks, securities companies and insurance firms as well as provisions requiring financial service companies to disclose the institutions' privacy policies about nonpublic personal information. To foster competition and innovation in the financial services industry, title I of the Act repealed section 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act and amended section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.
While the primary focus of title I was demolishing the fire walls between banks, securities firms, and insurance companies by creating financial holding companies, the Act includes a provision that allows these newly created financial institutions to engage in any activity that is determined "to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity.
One of the first major efforts by regulators to expand the list of permissible activities under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is to allow financial holding companies and financial subsidiaries of nationally chartered banks to engage in real estate brokerage and real estate management services. But there is no indication that the issue will be resolved in the very near future.
Although we cannot speak the system of U.S is perfect, it seems that the system of Korea has many problems. Therefore, this article proposed several solutions by comparative study of the Korean system and the U.S system.
Consequently, we still can find out the fact which has a deep lineage in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. That is just the principle of segregation of business and financial capital.
The Act included provisions designed to facilitate affiliation among banks, securities companies and insurance firms as well as provisions requiring financial service companies to disclose the institutions' privacy policies about nonpublic personal information. To foster competition and innovation in the financial services industry, title I of the Act repealed section 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act and amended section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.
While the primary focus of title I was demolishing the fire walls between banks, securities firms, and insurance companies by creating financial holding companies, the Act includes a provision that allows these newly created financial institutions to engage in any activity that is determined "to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity.
One of the first major efforts by regulators to expand the list of permissible activities under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is to allow financial holding companies and financial subsidiaries of nationally chartered banks to engage in real estate brokerage and real estate management services. But there is no indication that the issue will be resolved in the very near future.
Although we cannot speak the system of U.S is perfect, it seems that the system of Korea has many problems. Therefore, this article proposed several solutions by comparative study of the Korean system and the U.S system.
Consequently, we still can find out the fact which has a deep lineage in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. That is just the principle of segregation of business and financial capital.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국에 있어서의 금융지주회사제도의 발전
Ⅲ. 미국 금융지주회사의 기준에 대한 개요
Ⅳ. 미국 금융지주회사의 감독체계
Ⅴ. 미국 은행지주회사법의 내용
Ⅵ. Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act에 따른 새로운 기준
Ⅶ. 우리 법제와의 비교 및 시사점
Ⅷ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 금융지주회사의 법제 현황
기업법연구
2010 .03
-
보험지주회사 도입논의를 위한 미국법제 연구
기업법연구
2009 .06
-
중국 금융지주회사 감독 법제에 관한 연구
동북아법연구
2011 .01
-
금융지주회사와 기업지배구조에 관한 법적 고찰
비교사법
2010 .06
-
금융지주회사 설립전후 투자자 반응
대한경영학회지
2010 .02
-
중국 금융지주회사(金融控股公司) 규제의 현황
기업법연구
2010 .03
-
한국 금융지주회사법상 비은행지주회사에 대한 비교법적 연구 : 미국법제를 중심으로
비교사법
2011 .06
-
금융지주회사제도의 문제점과 개선방안
기업법연구
2013 .03
-
보험회사의 계열 공익재단 기부에 관한 법적 문제
기업법연구
2013 .03
-
일본의 금융지주회사제도의 현황
기업법연구
2010 .03
-
자본시장통합법 시행에 따른 금융회사 효율성의 변화
경영과학
2012 .11
-
일본 보험지주회사 입법 그리고 한국 보험지주회사론
비교사법
2009 .06
-
보험지주회사 규제에 관한 소고
중앙법학
2009 .04
-
예금보험제도가 은행의 위험추구와 최적재무구조 그리고 기업가치에 미치는 영향
보험학회지
2006 .01
-
持株會社의 經營支配構造에 관한 改善方案
기업법연구
2013 .12
-
보험지주회사에 관한 법제 연구
보험학회지
2006 .01
-
금융지주회사의 설립방법에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2001 .12
-
금융지주회사의 자회사 은행에 대한 자본확충에 관한 법리적 고찰
기업법연구
2009 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-002240379