지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is a case-study on GI protection under the TRIPs. The case has been brought by The United States and Australia against EC concerning the protection of GI under the EC Regulation. The case has dealt with two important issues, the national treatment principle and the coexistence of GIs and Trademarks.
First of all, this article talks about the general GI system under the TRIPs and studies about the EC GI system(under the Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs). Then it provides the history about ED vs. U.S., Australia case and analyses the panel report in terms of the national treatment in several aspects and the relationship between GIs and prior trademarks.
The panel concluded that the EC Regulation violated the national treatment under the TRIPs, but the structure of EC system itself was complied with the TRIPs. Further, the panel concluded that the EC Regulation on the coexistence was consistent with art. 17 of the TRIPs as 'limited exceptions'.
However, there are still many problems to deal with about the protection of GIs in the international relationships. Because of the characteristics of GIs, it has great economic/trade stakes and historical and socio-cultural dimensions. As a result, the degree of protection is still sensitive and controversial at both international and national levels. In our situation negotiating the GI protection with the EU, this issues deserve to appreciate.
In compliance with the national treatment and the minimum standards under the TRIPs, it is necessary to measure the impotance of GIs in our marketplace and find out the adequate degree of GI protection in international trade relationships.
First of all, this article talks about the general GI system under the TRIPs and studies about the EC GI system(under the Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs). Then it provides the history about ED vs. U.S., Australia case and analyses the panel report in terms of the national treatment in several aspects and the relationship between GIs and prior trademarks.
The panel concluded that the EC Regulation violated the national treatment under the TRIPs, but the structure of EC system itself was complied with the TRIPs. Further, the panel concluded that the EC Regulation on the coexistence was consistent with art. 17 of the TRIPs as 'limited exceptions'.
However, there are still many problems to deal with about the protection of GIs in the international relationships. Because of the characteristics of GIs, it has great economic/trade stakes and historical and socio-cultural dimensions. As a result, the degree of protection is still sensitive and controversial at both international and national levels. In our situation negotiating the GI protection with the EU, this issues deserve to appreciate.
In compliance with the national treatment and the minimum standards under the TRIPs, it is necessary to measure the impotance of GIs in our marketplace and find out the adequate degree of GI protection in international trade relationships.
#지리적 표시
#무역관련지적재산권협정
#유럽연합 농산품 및 식품의 지리적 표시 및 원산지명칭 보호에 관한 이사회규칙
#내국민대우원칙
#상호주의
#동등성
#최소기준보호의 원칙
#Geographical Indication
#TRIPs
#Council Reglation(EEC) No. 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs
#National Treatment
#Reciprocity
#Equivalence
#Minimum Standards
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. EU 지리적 표시제도-EC(현EU)농산품 및 식품의 지리적 표시 및 원산지명칭 보호에 관한 이사회규칙 2081/92상 지리적 표시보호를 중심으로
Ⅲ. 미국ㆍ호주 vs. EU : 지리적 표시 사건(DS 174, 290, 2005.4.20.-패널)
Ⅳ. 쟁점 및 해설
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
TRIPs-plus를 통한 지리적표시의 보호
한양법학
2011 .02
-
지리적표시 보호법제에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2008 .03
-
TRIPs협정과 우리 상표법의 지리적 표시 보호제도
중앙법학
2008 .10
-
'EC-농산품 및 식료품의 상표 및 지리적 표시 보호' 사건
통상법률
2005 .12
-
GIS와 都市計劃
국토
1993 .06
-
지리적 표시 보호에 관한 연구
지식재산연구
2009 .03
-
중장기 차원의 국가GIS 정책 분석 및 발전전략
국토연구
2005 .12
-
The International Protection of Geographical Indications : The Road Not Taken: From "Two-Tiered System" To Harmonization
국제경제법연구
2009 .05
-
商標와 地理的 標示의 衝突에 관한 硏究 : WTO에서의 論議를 中心으로
통상법률
2004 .08
-
GIS와 삶의 질 : 생활속의 GIS ( GIS and Quality of Life : Societal GIS )
대한지리학회지
2000 .06
-
GIS의 발전방향에 관한 연구
관광지리학
1994 .12
-
교육 현장의 GIS 관련 상황과 교육적 사용을 위해 고려해야 할 요소
한국지리환경교육학회지
2010 .01
-
상표법상 증명표장에 의한 지리적 표시의 보호 고찰
비교사법
2010 .06
-
무역 및 관세 원활화를 위한 지리적 표시 보호에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2008 .02
-
북한의 GIS 연구동향 분석
한국지리정보학회지
2007 .01
-
GIS 시장개척과 지리학의 가능성
대한지리학회지
2004 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002239970