지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims at an ethical review of gene therapy. For this purpose, I try to understand the ethical significance by categorizing it into three parts : somatic cell gene therapy, germ-line gene therapy, and gene manipulation for the improvement of gene function.
First of all, somatic cell gene therapy has the general agreement that it has no ethical problems because its techniques are the same as blood transfusion or organ transplantation. Furthermore the somatic cell gene therapy can solve the problem of selective abortion.
However, since we cannot ignore the possibility that the somatic cell gene therapy can control human's actions, we should limit this operation.
Secondly, germ-line cell gene therapy is a hot issue. Some people support it because of its medical utilities, repect of the parent's autonomy, the right of freedom on scientific study, and the duty of improvement of the future generation.
On the contrary, I analyzed that some are opposed to it because of its scientific uncertainty, clinical risks(hazard), the slippery slope on the improvement of human species, the uncertainty of the approvement by the future generation, the distribution of resources, and the interference on the whole genetical endowment.
Thirdly, gene therapy is related to the improvement of human traits. In general this claim has many objections, such as playing God, the call for eugenics, the impossibility of value agreement in the view of cultural relativism.
However, the development of genetic engineering is transferring the objections to voices of support. For this we should try to make counter-plans. One way to do this is to emphasize the responsibility on future generations. To be moral, we must release the future generation free from genetic diseases. And thus we should eliminate the origin of injustice and unequality. Futhermore, we have the responsibility to pass down good genes to the future generation. This is a mental gene that will make up a world of peace and love.
First of all, somatic cell gene therapy has the general agreement that it has no ethical problems because its techniques are the same as blood transfusion or organ transplantation. Furthermore the somatic cell gene therapy can solve the problem of selective abortion.
However, since we cannot ignore the possibility that the somatic cell gene therapy can control human's actions, we should limit this operation.
Secondly, germ-line cell gene therapy is a hot issue. Some people support it because of its medical utilities, repect of the parent's autonomy, the right of freedom on scientific study, and the duty of improvement of the future generation.
On the contrary, I analyzed that some are opposed to it because of its scientific uncertainty, clinical risks(hazard), the slippery slope on the improvement of human species, the uncertainty of the approvement by the future generation, the distribution of resources, and the interference on the whole genetical endowment.
Thirdly, gene therapy is related to the improvement of human traits. In general this claim has many objections, such as playing God, the call for eugenics, the impossibility of value agreement in the view of cultural relativism.
However, the development of genetic engineering is transferring the objections to voices of support. For this we should try to make counter-plans. One way to do this is to emphasize the responsibility on future generations. To be moral, we must release the future generation free from genetic diseases. And thus we should eliminate the origin of injustice and unequality. Futhermore, we have the responsibility to pass down good genes to the future generation. This is a mental gene that will make up a world of peace and love.
목차
1. 체세포 유전자 치료에 대한 윤리적 함의
2. 생식선세포(germ-line cell) 유전자 치료의 윤리적 함의
3. 인간 기질 향상에 관한 윤리적 함의
4. 미래 세대에 대한 책임의 요청
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유전자치료의 기술개발 동향분석
기술혁신학회지
2002 .12
-
유전자편집 기술의 발전에 대응한 인간배아 유전자치료의 규제방향
생명윤리
2016 .06
-
Time Series Expression E.coli Prediction for Gene Regulatory Network Reconstruction
한국지식정보기술학회 논문지
2015 .01
-
'생명윤리및안전에관한법률'의 분석
생명윤리
2004 .06
-
Gene of Smart Contents
International Digital Design Invitation Exhibition
2011 .05
-
Implementation of Gene Information System
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2018 .05
-
배아 유전자 치료 : 왜 이 시점에 쟁점이 되고 있는가
생명윤리
2017 .12
-
‘粥’과 ‘餃子’ : 중국 고대 張仲景의 ‘食治’에 관한 역사와 신화
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2018 .05
-
인간 배아 및 생식계열의 유전적 변형(human Embryo and Germ-line genetic modification) 행위에 대한 용어 정의의 필요성과 그 용어의 조건
생명윤리
2020 .06
-
해부학적 구조를 이용한 유전자 정보 통합 기법
디지털융복합연구
2015 .01
-
유전체 분석 초기 단계에서 유전자 리스트 작성을 위한 방법론
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2003 .11
-
[자료논문 1] Moral grounds for gene technology
생명윤리
2007 .12
-
자연광을 이용한 Light Therapy 활용가능성에 관한 연구
한국생활환경학회지
2016 .02
-
인지행동이론을 활용한 집단미술치료가 비행청소년의 애착과분노에 미친 영향
청소년시설환경
2015 .01
-
청소년 내담자를 위한 인형치료에서 ‘내면아이’의 중요성과 치료적 활용에 관한 사례연구
청소년시설환경
2014 .01
-
Art Therapy for PTSD in Traumatized Patients after Disasters
예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
2018 .01
-
유전자 편집의 윤리
생명, 윤리와 정책
2018 .10
-
심상 시치료 프로그램이 노인의 정신건강에 미치는 효과
예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
2019 .01
-
유전정보에 대한 윤리적 쟁점의 변천
생명윤리
2014 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-570-002513393